I'm pointing out that saying it doesn't have a "message" is stupid or that it needs a "message" to be good and I am using a stupid example to make that point. Picard S2 was pretty overt with its message and was pretty bland at best. Sometimes they have a message and its insultingly simple or just plain stupid like they did then. Sometimes the "message" or vision or whatever you want to call it is more subtle.You're picking DS9 as an example of Trek not having a meaningful message? No disrespect intended, but this choice betrays a surprisingly superficial understanding of Trek.
Besides the fact that allegorical social commentary was and is a key feature of Trek since TOS, and, if you pardon the conceit, "Gene's vision," DS9 alone explicitly explored Afrofuturism, religious extremism, ontological fluidity, race and civil rights in "utopia," gender fluidity, representation, when and if terrorism is permissible, etc...
This barely scratches the surface of the themes considered in individual episodes.
IMO, Picard S3 betrays Trek's vision, and while I can enjoy it the same way I enjoyed ST09, I'm not looking forward to more of it.
None of it matters if it isn't entertaining or interesting.