Babaganoosh said:
I mean no disrespect to John, of course, but shouldn't a novel so heavy on Trelane be voiced *by* Trelane? Did Campbell not want to do it or something?
It's possible that they did record an audio version together, but that it ran afoul of the same licensing issue that nearly scuppered the Q-in-Law audio; namely, that the license covers a reading of the book, not a dramatization of the book. It was because Majel was Mrs. Roddenberry that Q-in-Law flew. William Campbell doesn't have pull like that.Therin of Andor said:
This anecdote led us Aussies to believe that they were both on the actual audio production but, when it came out, it was de Lancie only, so I still don't know if Campbell recorded his Trelane bits, and they weren't working out properly, or if de Lancie meant only that Campbell had presented some excerpts with him live, but not for Simon & Schuster Audioworks.
Yeah, but the OP apparently hasn't read the book yet. So I think the spoiler code is mostly for his sake.Allyn Gibson said:
Spoiler codes? On a book that's been out nearly fifteen years? There's a freakin' Statute of Limitations, y'know. Sheesh...
JD said:
Yeah, but the OP apparently hasn't read the book yet. So I think the spoiler code is mostly for his sake.Allyn Gibson said:
Spoiler codes? On a book that's been out nearly fifteen years? There's a freakin' Statute of Limitations, y'know. Sheesh...
Trek said:
I was very pleased that the events of this book got a mention in "Q&A" too. (Not really a spolier as it's only one line).
sgsmitty said:
JD said:
Yeah, but the OP apparently hasn't read the book yet. So I think the spoiler code is mostly for his sake.Allyn Gibson said:
Spoiler codes? On a book that's been out nearly fifteen years? There's a freakin' Statute of Limitations, y'know. Sheesh...
Correct, I have not read it yet. Starting it today as a matter of fact.![]()
Christopher said:
^^Not that the Captain Sulu audios were actually full dramatizations -- more like half-dramatizations.
Page 121-122---CommanderJMic said:
Trek said:
I was very pleased that the events of this book got a mention in "Q&A" too. (Not really a spolier as it's only one line).
really? where is it? i must have missed it.
Turtletrekker said:
Page 121-122---CommanderJMic said:
Trek said:
I was very pleased that the events of this book got a mention in "Q&A" too. (Not really a spolier as it's only one line).
really? where is it? i must have missed it.
He was the Continuum's dutiful little boy now, cleaning up all their messes. First Trelane, now the philosopher.
Yes.The philosopher? Would that be Quinn?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.