• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

PROMETHEUS - Grade and Discuss

Prometheus - Poll

  • Total voters
    232
  • Poll closed .
Someone needs to subtitle the scene where David speaks to the Engineer with a "Your mom" joke. That would explain quite a lot.


Why did the Engineers leave a map to their military facility on Earth?

And apparently, the final Engineer was so pissed about David's your mom insult that he totally forgot about the toxic atmosphere. He just ran all the way to the escape module without a helmet.



And seriously... I'd like to see a film where things go wrong even though people are professionals at what they do. Seriously, it wouldn't have been hard with that kind of setup. Those characters were some of the greatest movie idiots I've ever seen.
 
Last edited:
JarodRussell said:
Speaking of Engineers... it would have been something had the Engineer they've woken up in the end actually recognized friend from foe. He wakes up after 2000 years of sleep. Shaw talks to him, gets beaten up by the other guys. I would have expected that he would have at least TRIED to understand what the hell was going on all of a sudden.
Click to expand...

David: "This man is dying..."

Engineer: "Woah, woah...let me get some coffee first. Jeez, I've asleep for awhile....*checks clock*....2000 years?! Damn, I gotta piss really bad, too."
 
Disruptor said:
JarodRussell said:
Speaking of Engineers... it would have been something had the Engineer they've woken up in the end actually recognized friend from foe. He wakes up after 2000 years of sleep. Shaw talks to him, gets beaten up by the other guys. I would have expected that he would have at least TRIED to understand what the hell was going on all of a sudden.
Click to expand...

David: "This man is dying..."

Engineer: "Woah, woah...let me get some coffee first. Jeez, I've asleep for awhile....*checks clock*....2000 years?! Damn, I gotta piss really bad, too."
Click to expand...
:lol:
 
JarodRussell said:
Why did the Engineers leave a map to their military facility on Earth?
Click to expand...
I have a couple of ideas. At the time that the Engineers left all of those maps, that was their "diplomatic outpost" with sentient life forms around the galaxy. But as we all know, sometimes things change. After a thousand Earth years or so, the planet was repurposed for military testing. "But what about the map hints left on Earth?" They didn't have high hopes for humanity and figured that they'd never make the connection or develop the technology to get there.

I have another idea, that the map was a "trip alarm". Maybe the Engineers had made the determination that if the humans developed in a way that they approved of, there would have been a signal sent from Earth out into space, directed at various places that expected sentient life forms to receive it. What they'd consider the most appropriate form of "first contact." But, if instead the humans made an unannounced visit to the planet outlined in the map, that would mean humanity was inherently hostile. The Engineer being awakened realized "Oh shit, they're here! This went all wrong. Damned it, I've got to kill them all."
 
Or the engineers just stock planets for the Predators. ;)

Another twist they could've taken is if the Ancient looked at the old man and took a measure of his evil, perhaps using ESP or some other sense to see his aura (shown with a quick visual effect) or parts of his memories (also easy with a longer visual sequence). Then he'd have a motive for wanting to kill the crew, but of course that would make too much sense.
 
Gary7 said:
What they'd consider the most appropriate form of "first contact." But, if instead the humans made an unannounced visit to the planet outlined in the map, that would mean humanity was inherently hostile.
Click to expand...

I can't really follow that logic. Just because someone personally shows up doesn't mean he is hostile.
 
RAMA said:
Kind of surprised by the early feedback, I really would have though this would have been better SF than Avengers, and would get better notices. Still, I can't wait to see friday it...I very rarely go see movies on the first day of release!!

RAMA
Click to expand...

Of course it's better SF than Avengers, because Avengers isn't science fiction at all. But this is. Whether it's the best it could have been is another matter, but it's certainly science fiction. That is commendable.

As for the rest, it is indeed predictable - but then again, so are all the Alien films to a degree.
It's a certainty that an alien will show up and wreak havoc at some point. The somewhat bigger problem is that it's structurally so similar to the 1979 Alien. The old ones, up to and incuding Resurrection, all had a distinct style and managed (more or less successfully) to tell a horror story with the xenomorph that was distinct from the other ones. This one surely doesn't
.

But that said, I found it tremendously entertaining, pleasantly scary and EXTREMELY well-designed. The central hook of the story,
the search for extraterrestial "Gods", hooked me indeed. But it may have been a better choice ultimately to either tie the film in to Alien more or to do so less. As it is, the "Engineer" story, what they are about, the threat they pose (all very interesting in and of itself) competes for attention with lots of questions regarding "How is this related to the xenomorph?", thus losing focus. Or I did as a result.

Whatever the case may be, I'd be on board for a sequel, which this deserves, and requires.
 
Problem is that this film is basically just sequel bait. Just do a film as best as you can, save nothing up for later.
 
True. But that's less a problem of this film but of the current film industry as a whole. The original Alien films were made in an era where most if not all films were made without any sequel potential - because they weren't the norm. These days, even movies such as The Hangover get a sequel because they do well financially. Or even more obscene (IMO) the greenlighting of sequels before a first film has even premiered (yes, Star Trek included), because quality or audience reaction doesn't matter as much anymore as audience tracking and the very accurate box-office projections that studios make.

That's why filmmakers and studios, Scott and Fox included, can write and film their project to allow for sequels from the get-go. Sign of the times...
 
From this film and others it's increasingly clear the studios won't spend the money on a scientific adviser anymore.
 
After Destination: Moon in 1951 actual science advising has been rather hit-and-miss in film and television SF. Actually it was spotty before that, too, after Fritz Lang's Frau Im Mond (Woman In The Moon) in 1929.
 
Last edited:
Prof. Brian Cox from BBC's Wonder's series was scientific advisor on Sunshine. He said the first thing he did when he read the script was go "wrong, wrong, wrong" to the premise but without that there's no film, so he concentrated on making stuff work for the rest of the film.
 
Bob the Skutter said:
Prof. Brian Cox from BBC's Wonder's series was scientific advisor on Sunshine. He said the first thing he did when he read the script was go "wrong, wrong, wrong" to the premise but without that there's no film, so he concentrated on making stuff work for the rest of the film.
Click to expand...

I went "wrong, wrong, wrong" throughout that entire film. I think Sunshine is just as bad a Prometheus when it comes to totally stupid characters and plotholes. That film was very painful to watch.
 
JarodRussell said:
Bob the Skutter said:
Prof. Brian Cox from BBC's Wonder's series was scientific advisor on Sunshine. He said the first thing he did when he read the script was go "wrong, wrong, wrong" to the premise but without that there's no film, so he concentrated on making stuff work for the rest of the film.
Click to expand...

I went "wrong, wrong, wrong" throughout that entire film. I think Sunshine is just as bad a Prometheus when it comes to totally stupid characters and plotholes. That film was very painful to watch.
Click to expand...

I seem to remember enjoying the first 2/3rds or so, but I haven't seen it since it was on at the cinema.
 
JarodRussell said:
Bob the Skutter said:
Prof. Brian Cox from BBC's Wonder's series was scientific advisor on Sunshine. He said the first thing he did when he read the script was go "wrong, wrong, wrong" to the premise but without that there's no film, so he concentrated on making stuff work for the rest of the film.
Click to expand...

I went "wrong, wrong, wrong" throughout that entire film. I think Sunshine is just as bad a Prometheus when it comes to totally stupid characters and plotholes. That film was very painful to watch.
Click to expand...

I'm GENERALLY fine with not great science in sci fi (unless it's egregious) if I'm engaged with the characters and the story. It falls into suspension of disbelief.

A film can have all the accurate science it wants, if it's not compelling, if the characters are idiots, if the plot is contrived and relies on coincidence, it's a shit film... no matter how good the science.
 
I just wish people who cracked a book once in a while or paid attention in high school were allowed to make movies.

Don't think I'll live to see the day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top