I refer you to a one...Captain Esteban from ST III.
You're in an unstable area and something unknown pops up on your sensors.
...and you don't put the shields up.
Science vessel captains are bad tactical ones.
Yes, entirely based on that example...because what reason would a science vessel captain have to do anything beyond the minimum tactical training? They come in when things are cleared up usually.
Besides, it would have been far more interesting to see her go through growing pains as a captain instead of I AM GODDESS KATHRYN, I AM TEH AWSUM!
I know, I'm trying to find ways I could've liked the character better. Make her the first out of her depth captain!
so why question that? You may not like the character but don't belittle any Captain (from Kirk to Archer), because each series begins with them in command, the expected assumption should be that they have earned the right to be there.
so why question that? You may not like the character but don't belittle any Captain (from Kirk to Archer), because each series begins with them in command, the expected assumption should be that they have earned the right to be there.
Because by the time Voyager rolled around, many of us were bored of that perfect Starfleet captain and the same old shit?
I would have preferred that Janeway was the second or third officer and had to assume command after the Captain and XO are killed. That would have been something different, something interesting - a captain in the making. However, we just got TNG-lite in an nonsensical context.
where's the option for "i don't really care but all this Janeway stuff is getting fucking tiresome"?
I would have preferred that Janeway was the second or third officer and had to assume command after the Captain and XO are killed. That would have been something different, something interesting - a captain in the making. However, we just got TNG-lite in an nonsensical context.
Yep... a retrieval mission against what should have been overmatched Marquis ships. That's a tactical nightmareBut I'd argue her sciencey knowledge was needed in the sciencey Badlands.
I know, I'm trying to find ways I could've liked the character betterMake her the first out of her depth captain!
I didn't like Janeway, particularly in the later seasons, because of inconsistent characterization and bad writing. I do much prefer her to Archer, though.
I do enjoy seeing women in command, but we've had so many better examples in TrekLit - Rachel Garrett, Elizabeth Shelby. I'm really liking Captain Dax.
Rachel Garrett (Yesterday's Enterprise) and Elizabeth Shelby (Best of Both Worlds I) were both creations of TNG season 3.
I couldn't stand Janeway, and I'm a woman.
I felt like they did a much better job portraying a woman with great responsibility with Kira Nerys, and I would much sooner read about Kira in command than watch Janeway. I felt like Janeway was arbitrary in her decision-making and that's what gave me a bad impression of her. One minute she'd be all for principle and the next all for expediency. Some consistency would've been nice in that regard.
so why question that? You may not like the character but don't belittle any Captain (from Kirk to Archer), because each series begins with them in command, the expected assumption should be that they have earned the right to be there.
Because by the time Voyager rolled around, many of us were bored of that perfect Starfleet captain and the same old shit?
I would have preferred that Janeway was the second or third officer and had to assume command after the Captain and XO are killed. That would have been something different, something interesting - a captain in the making. However, we just got TNG-lite in an nonsensical context.
This came up in another thread and while it's not my idea the other poster didn't mind if I do a poll so here goes.
It's pretty simple. Do you like Janeway and are you male or female?
No, there's not an option for those who don't care one way or the other. It's not that we don't care about you - we're just not interested right now.![]()
I know, I'm trying to find ways I could've liked the character better. Make her the first out of her depth captain!
So are you saying that you would have been more comfortable with a weak female captain rather than a strong one?
The one thing that should be remembered is that all Trek Captains (and yes including Archer) are strong capable people. They are supposed to be written that way, so why question that? You may not like the character but don't belittle any Captain (from Kirk to Archer), because each series begins with them in command, the expected assumption should be that they have earned the right to be there.
By the way straight female, voting Janeway.
Brit
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.