Words have meaning, and the ignoring of some harmful words can be taken as permission to use them even more.
Words have meaning, and the ignoring of some harmful words can be taken as permission to use them even more.
I agree that everyone is deserving of basic dignity and respect. Real respect has to be freely given, though. Just as it is wrong to compel someone to convert to or away from a religion by the sword or by threats of ostracism or anything else--just as that is fear and not legitimate faith/disbelief--it's not legitimate respect if you only do it out of fear.
I'd rather people treat each other right for the right reasons...because it is right...and not under threat of consequences. (Unless of course someone is engaging in violence or threats of violence--that MUST be stopped.)
It does if the words are directed at you (or your friends or family memebers) again and again. What do you do then? Just sit there and be verbally abused?Words have meaning, and the ignoring of some harmful words can be taken as permission to use them even more.
And so? You actually have the ability to take the meaning out of these words, as I stated above. Using the words again and again makes no difference.
Which venues are you referring to? In my experience, those who voice objections to PC cover the whole political spectrum. The only thing they “skew” towards is a desire for common sense.. . . Also (and I say this at the risk of being considered "politically incorrect"), the majority of the complainers (in other venues besides here) about the whole idea of PC seem to skew Right and Religious. That just speaks volumes to me.
Not laws per se, but draconian “speech codes” that still exist at most American universities, and overbroad “harassment” policies at private businesses.There are no politically correct laws about what you have to say. What are you talking about?
It does if the words are directed at you (or your friends or family memebers) again and again. What do you do then? Just sit there and be verbally abused?Words have meaning, and the ignoring of some harmful words can be taken as permission to use them even more.
And so? You actually have the ability to take the meaning out of these words, as I stated above. Using the words again and again makes no difference.
Hell, if someone called my mother a whore, I’d take it as a compliment that he thinks she can still turn tricks at her age!I can only be verbally "abused" if I let it happen. Why can't you just shrug words off? Why do you insist on feeling insulted when someone calls your mother a whore?
I am pretty sure you are not part of a presently or historically oppressed minority, have never been violently and ceaselessly abused during your life, and have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.That's my point. I can only be verbally "abused" if I let it happen. Why can't you just shrug words off? Why do you insist on feeling insulted when someone calls your mother a whore?It does if the words are directed at you (or your friends or family memebers) again and again. What do you do then? Just sit there and be verbally abused?And so? You actually have the ability to take the meaning out of these words, as I stated above. Using the words again and again makes no difference.
You would be amazed what effect it has on people if you simply ignore their insults.
"Don't feed the troll" is a common trope around here, isn't it? Or "turn the other cheek", for the Christians among our members. What I'm talking about is the same principle, but applied to verbal "violence". I don't think it makes sense when it becomes physical. Only an idiot would not defend himself against a physical attack (if he's able to do it). But a verbal attack, just shrug it off.
LOL, I just realized that this was also a point in Star Trek 2009. One of nuSpock weaknesses is that he gets angry at people mocking him and totally looses it. That's exactly what I mean. A stable, confident person doesn't have the need to do that. Because, as I said before, you simply know better.
I am pretty sure you are not part of a presently or historically oppressed minority, have never been violently and ceaselessly abused during your life, and have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
Nice try but a Koch brothers financed think-tank like Cato merely produces propaganda.Not laws per se, but draconian “speech codes” that still exist at most American universities, and overbroad “harassment” policies at private businesses.
Your argument is important as a lot of actual discrimination is non-verbal but I nonetheless gotta disagree, words can be very painful. Just imagine a parent telling its child "I don't love you and have never loved you". Such emotional abuse is probably as bad as physical violence.I am, but given that you simply can't know about it, I forgive you.
The important difference between words and actions is what I'm talking about.
Just think about what goes through your mind when words insult you. You are annoyed by what I said right now, aren't you? Please tell me exactly why.
From what I gather, you feel annoyed because you think I haven't endured what either you, or people you know, have endured, and now you almost feel insulted by that.
And now, whatever reason you may have, there's where your own decision comes into play: you can either decide to feel insulted, or you can decide to say: let the guy talk, he knows nothing.
It actually is that simple.
Yep. That's right. No idea at all.
Your argument is important as a lot of actual discrimination is non-verbal but I nonetheless gotta disagree, words can be very painful. Just imagine a parent telling its child "I don't love you and have never loved you". Such emotional abuse is probably as bad as physical violence.
With factual examples to back up their assertions, if you’d actually bothered to read the piece instead of responding with a knee-jerk reaction. I only linked to that particular article because it happened to be near the top of the list on a Google search.Nice try but a Koch brothers financed think-tank like Cato merely produces propaganda.Not laws per se, but draconian “speech codes” that still exist at most American universities, and overbroad “harassment” policies at private businesses.
I am not annoyed. I am pointing out that your argument ignores (purposefully, I suspect) every aspect of human social interaction, and the very essence of human nature.
The problem of racist, sexist or homophobic remarks is that they may be a precursor to actual violence.Your argument is important as a lot of actual discrimination is non-verbal but I nonetheless gotta disagree, words can be very painful. Just imagine a parent telling its child "I don't love you and have never loved you". Such emotional abuse is probably as bad as physical violence.
That one I give you. If a loved or respected person tells you that, it hurts badly. But even then you can try to take away the power of these words by trying to stay as calm as possible. Even if you manage to show no reaction on the outside (while you're a total mess inside), you "win", because your opponent thinks he didn't hurt you with that, so he didn't achieve his goal. And that's about it. Words are used as "weapons" to hurt others. And just with physical violence, you need strength to deflect them. It takes a lot more strength to deal with insults coming from loved ones, it takes less strength to deal with remarks coming from people you don't know or don't care about.
Racist remarks for example come mostly from people you don't even know. So why give them more power over you than they actually have? If you let their verbal attacks hurt you, they've achieved what they wanted.
The problem of racist, sexist or homophobic remarks is that they may be a precursor to actual violence.
I do agree though with your point that not caring about insults is a good strategy. People who are mobbed / made fun of / excluded in a particular social group are sometimes the ones that can be easily picked on.
To restate:I don't think I understand. What essence would that be?I am not annoyed. I am pointing out that your argument ignores (purposefully, I suspect) every aspect of human social interaction, and the very essence of human nature.
I already provided as much entertainment to your evening as I'm willing to provide tonight, because it happened for please me for a little while. Now go play with somebody else.I am pointing out that your argument ignores (purposefully, I suspect) every aspect of human social interaction, and the very essence of human nature.
That just doesn't work. An attack is an attack, regardless if it's verbal or physical. One doesn't have to respond in kind, but one still has the right not to just accept the abuse.It does if the words are directed at you (or your friends or family memebers) again and again. What do you do then? Just sit there and be verbally abused?And so? You actually have the ability to take the meaning out of these words, as I stated above. Using the words again and again makes no difference.
That's my point. I can only be verbally "abused" if I let it happen. Why can't you just shrug words off? Why do you insist on feeling insulted when someone calls your mother a whore?
You would be amazed what effect it has on people if you simply ignore their insults.
"Don't feed the troll" is a common trope around here, isn't it? Or "turn the other cheek", for the Christians among our members. What I'm talking about is the same principle, but applied to verbal "violence". I don't think it makes sense when it becomes physical. Only an idiot would not defend himself against a physical attack (if he's able to do it). But a verbal attack, just shrug it off.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.