Best part.you mean, after the credits?
Best part.you mean, after the credits?
You all have excellent reasons, Gaith.Yeah, it heavily implies that Plinkett doesn't have excellent reasons for being an implicit member of the Star Wars Prequel Rejection Society, though he clearly does.
BTW, are you guys planning some kind of an anti-prequel rally on February 10 next year, when Phantom Menace 3D opens in theaters? That would be a blast. Assuming most of you aren't going to be busy standing in line for tickets, of course.![]()
A rally? Ooh... don't tempt me...You all have excellent reasons, Gaith.Yeah, it heavily implies that Plinkett doesn't have excellent reasons for being an implicit member of the Star Wars Prequel Rejection Society, though he clearly does.
BTW, are you guys planning some kind of an anti-prequel rally on February 10 next year, when Phantom Menace 3D opens in theaters? That would be a blast. Assuming most of you aren't going to be busy standing in line for tickets, of course.![]()
Anti-prequel rally? Nobody's thought of that before? Better late than never, I suppose. Sign me up.![]()
"Everybody watch A New Hope Day"?Anti-prequel rally? Nobody's thought of that before? Better late than never, I suppose. Sign me up.![]()
A boycott would be way easier. And a little less nerdy.
Why should Stoklasa's popularity in the PT-hater realm, including those who "can't even articulate their own butthurt", even matter to non-haters? Unless one is a slave to the views of the majority, it shouldn't make any difference how large this group ultimately gets. Appeal to popularity does not substitute for an argument, and additional followers won't magically erase the fact that the vast majority of Stoklasa's supposed points do not stand up to scrutiny and have been revealed to be invalid.Star Wars fanboy butthurt at Plinkett's popularity
the fact that the vast majority of Stoklasa's supposed points do not stand up to scrutiny and have been revealed to be invalid.
Please give some examples.
And even if your examples fit the bill as technically being invalid, Mike's original points still are valid from the perspective of someone who wants to go to the movies for an afternoon. That's why the 108-page rebuttal is a pile of crap.
In truth, a film goer shouldn't HAVE to look at it carefully to understand.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.