Picard's atheism?

I dunno about Picard, but Kirk implies in that ep with this greek-god-bloke that there is just one god, or something like that.

So Kirk is religious. I can't understand why, tho.

I think even Spock is religious in some way.
 
Personally I think Picard's objection was based on not wanting to allow the Mintakans to worship HIM as a god, not gods in general.
 
Picard believed in whatever vague new-age words the writer of the week wanted to come out of his mouth. So he'd poo poo religion and then make noises about "something greater after death" (or whatever he says in some conversation with Data).
 
Well according to Ron Moore, one of Gene's rules was that there was no religion in the 24th century. That isn't canon since it was never stated in the show, but that is the way that the writers were forced to write the characters.

Or contradicted by people like the Bajorans.
Plus its a bit of a sweeping statement/generalization.
 
Wasn't there a discussion Picard had once with Q, where Q claimed to be God, and Picard said he refuses to belief that because the universe was not so badly created... where was that? I couldn't find the quote... maybe I'm insane.

That's from Tapestry.
 
I dunno about Picard, but Kirk implies in that ep with this greek-god-bloke that there is just one god, or something like that.

So Kirk is religious. I can't understand why, tho.

I think even Spock is religious in some way.

That doesn't mean that he is religious anymore than Uhura's comment about people worshipping the son of God does. In neither case do they come out and say that they worship a God or who that God might be.
 
Well according to Ron Moore, one of Gene's rules was that there was no religion in the 24th century. That isn't canon since it was never stated in the show, but that is the way that the writers were forced to write the characters.

Or contradicted by people like the Bajorans.
Plus its a bit of a sweeping statement/generalization.

I think Gene was referring to 24th century humans (although I cannot be certain of that). He seemed to be okay with aliens being "imperfect", but humans had to be perfect with little or no flaws.

As an atheist I find the whole notion that religion will be dead in three hundred years to be paradise ;), but entirely unbelievable.
 
I would say he is an agnostic atheist, one who doesn't believe in a god but who doesn't claim to know that there is none. Personally, I don't think it matters.

An atheist believes, without question, that there is no god. An agnostic claims not to know one way or the other. The two philosophies are mutually exclusive.

But I also agree that it doesn't matter one wet load of sehlat kidneys.
 
An atheist believes, without question, that there is no god. An agnostic claims not to know one way or the other. The two philosophies are mutually exclusive.

That is what I used to think too, but it isn't so. A gnostic is a person who absolutely knows that what they believe is true, and an agnostic is a person who only believes a thing and doesn't claim to have knowledge that it is true. Thus you can be a gnostic theist, an agnostic theist, a gnostic atheist and an agnostic atheist, such as myself.

An atheist is a person who does not believe in a god. They are not somebody who completely rejects the possibility of a god, they merely do not believe in one themselves.

The confusion about this stems from the fact that atheists are seen as being a bad thing by many theists as they really don't understand what atheism is, so instead some people claim to be an agnostic as that is seen as being an inoffensive middle ground. In reality, all agnostics are agnostic atheists unless they believe in a god of some form, in which case the are agnostic theists.

I am an atheist, I am 99.999% certain that there is no god. I also know that I can never entirely disprove the existence of a god, therefore I am a agnostic atheist.
 
I always saw McCoy as a card carrying atheist.

I don't believe in a Supreme Being but I'd still say "Oh my God!" and the like as a figure of speech. But I can't imagine an agnostic or atheist ever saying "Sweet Jesus!" like McCoy did in TUC.

I'm an atheist and I use those expressions and similar all the time , because I just happen to speak idiomatic English. ;)

I'm an atheist because I've encountered no persuasive evidence that something like "god" exists, and I don't default to belief for no reason - you know, "extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof." There's no knowing for certain about it, but that doesn't make me "agnostic."
 
Well according to Ron Moore, one of Gene's rules was that there was no religion in the 24th century. That isn't canon since it was never stated in the show, but that is the way that the writers were forced to write the characters.

Or contradicted by people like the Bajorans.
Plus its a bit of a sweeping statement/generalization.

I think Gene was referring to 24th century humans (although I cannot be certain of that). He seemed to be okay with aliens being "imperfect", but humans had to be perfect with little or no flaws.

As an atheist I find the whole notion that religion will be dead in three hundred years to be paradise ;), but entirely unbelievable.

And yet... we had all those annoying humans!! lol

Historically, from what I remember of my history, the atheistic periods of history have been some of the worse, at one point the life expectancy in one area was 14... but I didn't study very modern history.

But I can't imagine we'll see a time when there won't be an religion. TBH, I wouldn't want it... its individuals that are the problem- the violent, the greedy etc.
 
It's also worth noting that "Sweet Jesus!" was a Meyerism, the same Meyer who had Bones say "According to myth, the earth was created in six days." As a twelve year old Christian (a thirty-eight year old atheist now, thanks), that line shook me: my one (chosen) religion was calling my other (imposed) religion a myth and I had no Norman to co-ordinate. Oy! Sweet Gene, but that was rough!
 
Historically, from what I remember of my history, the atheistic periods of history have been some of the worse, at one point the life expectancy in one area was 14...

You've either accepted or are drawing some really unjustified conclusions there. As long as you're going to oversimplify, have you considered that causation might run in the opposite direction? If my life expectancy was fourteen I might decide there was no reason to believe in God. :lol:
 
Historically, from what I remember of my history, the atheistic periods of history have been some of the worse, at one point the life expectancy in one area was 14...

You've either accepted or are drawing some really unjustified conclusions there. As long as you're going to oversimplify, have you considered that causation might run in the opposite direction? If my life expectancy was fourteen I might decide there was no reason to believe in God. :lol:

The period I studied in England a few hundred years ago was a time when people in general had decided there was no god, and therefore were doing whatever they wanted hang the consequences to others. It was a kind of rebellion I think against the very rigid religious beliefs of the time. Apparently there was a great deal of child-abandonment, which I believe accounts for the mortality rate- if most of the kids die by the time they're toddlers... and if very promiscuous sex is rampant- you'll have a lot of people dying from childbirth, archaic abortions and pregnancies too. I don't think mortality rates affect people's belief in supreme entities... at least not that I've seen, usually, historically. Today its probably somewhat different. *shrug*
 
Huh, I always thought being Agnostic meant that you did believe in God but you didn't believe or practice any existing faith.
 
Back
Top