That’s the registry used on Memory Alpha. Sorry, what is the problem with this registry number?
Blass took the registry number from the TNG USS Lexington article at Memory Alpha. The problem was that MA took the registry of *a* Lexington from the barely perceptible ship list in “Measure of a Man” which was 30405, and gave it to the Nebula class ship seen in DS9. MOAM was produced a year before the idea of the Nebula class even existed, so that 30405 Lexington was clearly not meant to be a Nebula class, but instead an older class based on that low registry (in every other case, a Nebula class has always had a 6XXXX or 7XXXX registry.) But MA insisted on merging the two ships together, since we never saw the Nebula Lexington’s registry on the studio model on screen, despite the MOAM registry not making sense for that ship.
Of course, one can argue that registries are not chronological, but it’s still awkward that 14 Nebula class ships have 6XXXX and 7XXXX registries, but this one is an extreme outlier. It would have been more logical to assume that the 30405 Lexington was in service at the beginning of TNG but was decommissioned and replaced by the newer Nebula class by the time we actually see the ship in DS9.
Yes:Is the USS Pioneer seen in the display actually the Pioneer-class used in Star Trek Online's Agents of Yesterday storyline? I think the registry number and profile match.
https://memory-beta.fandom.com/wiki/Pioneer_class?file=Pioneer_class.jpg
so they probably didn't pay attention to all the details.
It’s available!Excellent - not all of the TOS-style classes in STO look good, but I have a soft spot for that one (since it's your starter ship but also because it does look like a "baby Connie" that might fulfil a similar dynamic to the Connie as the Intrepid did to the Galaxy - is it printable via GamePrint? It looks a bit tricky to kitbash, and Eaglemoss never got around to it sadly.
I think the Pioneer was the best TOS ship that STO has put out. The Theseus is my close second. The Atlas looks like an overweight Constitution, and the Ranger and the Gemini are ok.It’s available!
View attachment 33476
GamePrint link: https://gameprint.integralrealitylabs.com/gameprint/product/eeh9vbTEhS5HKzxZ3
For the folks unfamiliar with these STO ships, take a peek here: https://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/10015203I think the Pioneer was the best TOS ship that STO has put out. The Theseus is my close second. The Atlas looks like an overweight Constitution, and the Ranger and the Gemini are ok.
They've used an AI-upscaler so that the shots from the ep can be zoomed in. Also done on the Excelsior, Stargazer, K'T'inga, NX-01, Argo, Defiant, and Wersching. And there are a few that they probably were going to use it on but didn't, and can be seen to be pixelated and have image artifacts. (Sentinel, Lexington, Pioneer, Romulan Bird of Prey.)Why does the Saratoga look like it’s had some kind of swirly art filter done on it but the others look normal? Kind of a noodle-scratcher.![]()
I get what you're saying, completely. While we know that registry numbers are basically bullshit to the writers, we in the community try to work out the logic.
So first, the only explanation given for the free-floating tons of wreckage the Titan is hiding around is that it’s the ‘Chin’toka scrapyard.’ Chin’toka was the site of two battles seen on screen during the Dominion war between Starfleet and Jem’Hadar forces. The implication here is that this wreckage is the remains of Starfleet and Dominion ships from those battles. But then it should have been more accurately called a battle grave site, not a scrapyard. ‘Scrapyard’ implies something like Qualor II, where ships and wreckage were brought to a yard for storage or parts reuse, and overseen by a yard crew. This is just random wreckage flying all over the place.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.