It seems to me far more feasible that they'd build large sections on the ground to allow workers unskilled in the dangerous art of zero-G vacuum construction to work on it. Larger labor pool, safer, lower cost.That's like building the ship on the ground. Sure, you could do it, but why the hell would you when there are far more feasible ways to go about it?
It seems to me far more feasible that they'd build large sections on the ground to allow workers unskilled in the dangerous art of zero-G vacuum construction to work on it. Larger labor pool, safer, lower cost.That's like building the ship on the ground. Sure, you could do it, but why the hell would you when there are far more feasible ways to go about it?
And how do you launch that thing without vaporizing half of Iowa? Any savings in building it on the ground are blown by having to expend the energy of lifting that behemoth into orbit. As I and others have pointed out, it's not a matter of canon, it's a matter of credibility, and building a monster like that on the ground is not credible.
So, there's a scene where Gandalf comes in, raises his staff, and up goes the ship?
So, there's a scene where Gandalf comes in, raises his staff, and up goes the ship?
So, expend all the power required to lift a 200,000 metric ton object out of a fairly intense gravity well and hope to hell you don't blow a fuse in the process and trash the entire ship in the process, wasting billions in credits, years of work, and probably kill God only know how many people....or use a lot less energy sending up pieces, assembling them in an orbital drydock (like we've seen numerous times already) and not risk the entire project if something goes wrong during launch.
Yeah. Right. Tell me another one.
But that's NOT the way it's been done for generations. Just look the launch of the NX-01 Enterprise and NX-02 Columbia.
The same way it was originally envisioned being built in large sections and then boosted into and assembled in orbit - boost it in sections using anti-gravs.And how do you launch that thing without vaporizing half of Iowa? Any savings in building it on the ground are blown by having to expend the energy of lifting that behemoth into orbit. As I and others have pointed out, it's not a matter of canon, it's a matter of credibility, and building a monster like that on the ground is not credible.
But that's NOT the way it's been done for generations. Just look the launch of the NX-01 Enterprise and NX-02 Columbia.
Hell, for that matter, take a look at the International Space Station.
Child's play in the Trek universe. Just for example, the BOP and Voyager both seemed to do it pretty well.So, expend all the power required to lift a 200,000 metric ton object out of a fairly intense gravity well
I imagine they do it real careful like....and hope to hell you don't blow a fuse in the process and trash the entire ship in the process, wasting billions in credits, years of work, and probably kill God only know how many people...
It's not actually less energy. Probably more, but not all at once. Like credit....or use a lot less energy sending up pieces, assembling them in an orbital drydock
It's not much of a risk in the Trekverse....(like we've seen numerous times already) and not risk the entire project if something goes wrong during launch.
They can move faster than light.Yeah. Right. Tell me another one.
Probably from the Enterprise herself, pushing against the Earth. In that case it would be a thruster which acts as a repulsor beam. Or they could use anti-gravs. Or whatever the BOP used to take off - with little except a stiff breeze.Oh, and where exactly is this tractor beam coming from? If it's another ship, now we're talking about a ship fighting to stay aloft while also trying to lift up a couple hundred thousand TONS of deadweight.
Nah, nothing to go wrong there.
Still looking for a space background for this. Where is data65 when I need him?
Ok, here ya go. I tried to 3D it a little for ya.
![]()
I need a cigarette... two orgasms in five minutes... I'm exhausted...Ok, Sector 7 once I get started on this stuff I just can't stop. Here's your finished wallpaper. I hope ya like it.
![]()
There are enough differences in that ship that it could've been put out by any studio with any other name but "Star Trek" and there's a better than average chance that they could avoid a copyright infringement lawsuit.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.