For the curious a quick search of the database would indicate it impacts about 182,000 posts on the forum.
Some of it may be laziness, but a lot of it is probably that people just don't know.
Wait, I remember when that happened, but didn't realize it was retroactive?! Ouch.Ha ha, too bad they didn't do that a while back when Google came after us to get rid of 15 years worth of dodgy images. [/one weekend shot to hell]
Is this actually for real, because I've neither seen nor heard any sign of it happening?
Some of it may be laziness, but a lot of it is probably that people just don't know. Especially if you are in your late teens or early 20s, you may not even remember a time when self-hosting was commonplace and so wouldn't know that it's available or how to obtain it. Personal websites are pretty dead these days.
There is, of course, the fact that image hosting services tend to be free, while hosting isn't. And paid web hosting requires more technical competence than an image hosting service. And it's not unusual for someone to buy less hosting bandwidth than they need--a problem that is eliminated by using one of the large image sharing services.
As with so many other things in life, the path of least resistance dominates.
No kidding. $400 a year is batshit. Do you know how much general purpose hosting $400 a year can buy? A lot. Much, much more than Photobucket will give you.
Wait, I remember when that happened, but didn't realize it was retroactive?! Ouch.
That being said... for now, my images are still showing. If it's still working for me and Australis, I'm wondering if it's possible that they've started blocking US accounts first? (I don't actually remember if I had to identify my country when I signed up, but they could be going by IP address instead.) Or maybe they've started with users with higher bandwidth usage? I don't know, but some are still working, and some are blocked.
Yep. It was brutal. And they wouldn't tell us WHAT was offensive; just threatened to close us down if we HAD offensive content.
Which is why we're so conservative on pictures now.
Google is a firm believer in "do as we say, not as we do."When you say, "Shut us down," you mean advertising with Adsense, right?
With some of the images I've seen on Google recently for the most innocent of search terms, I'm amazed they have a leg to stand on.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.