• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Paul Wesley's incarnation of James T. Kirk

I think this was a level up in his performance. He definitely had more of a whiff of classic Kirk about him but this is still not TOS Kirk. I certainly feel now that he can do a passable version that gives you little glimpses. He's definitely growing on me.
 
I remamber when:

"With DS9 on the air now - GR is rolling in his Grave...JUST SAY NO TO 'DARK TREK'..."

I wonder how DS9 is viewed by a lot of Trek fans these days...? ;)

My opinion of DS9 has actually worsened due to two main factors:
  1. Battlestar Galactica - which was a fantastic show - but also clearly showed what type of series Ron Moore & co. actually wanted to make. Going back to DS9 it's now very obvious how much they had to bend over backwards to tell these types of stories in Trek, and how much better it fits in a different setting
  2. Discovery & Picard: because what was once the deconstruction of Star Trek's ideology by people who didn't believe in it, somehow became the template for all new shows - srsly both DIS & PIC tried SO HARD to be DS9, that they actively avoid similarity to TOS & TNG - the shows which name recognition they are based on, and which are the ones that have actually entered mainstream
The character work on DS9 is still fantastic, and the Dominion war/WWII IN SPACE! still works very well, especially because of the dark edges it has.

But all the other wars before that (Cardassian, Romulan, Klingon) just make me cringe so hard now, in how ridiculous "epic" but useless and forgotten they are, and remind me how every new show now needs to have their own enormous fleet battle every single season.

/unpopular opinion off
 
Wesley was fine as Kirk, here.
Actually not. He had the much bigger emotional burden - he was actively working on his whole live, experience, everyone he ever knew - to be completely wiped out. To never even exist in the first place. And he still does it, because it's the right thing to do.

But you wouldn't notice. Because he has the emotional range of a sponge.

Whereas La'an - which has the much weaker plot of getting & loosing a connection, is the one where you actually experience her feelings through her acting.

(Writing was also a factor. But still.)
 
The episode did feel rushed.As someone said it could have unfolded over a more extended time and the aborted arrest scene fell really flat.All that said I enjoyed this one.
It’s too bad that these new shorter seasons are limiting the exposure of the cast as La’an is a great character,portrayed by a great actress.
I feel like this series will be over before we know it.
 
The years may change but indignant and whiny fandom remains consistent.

To be fair, Enterprise S1 and S2 are still largely considered creatively bankrupt seasons by the fanbase and by Berman/Braga (on the commentary tracks). Faith of the Heart, the decon stuff, the TCW, and the re-used plots haven't aged well.

The love for S4 has always elevated the show. Even back then. Would love to have Manny Coto work on future Trek projects, even as a staff writer.
 
But you wouldn't notice. Because he has the emotional range of a sponge.

Whereas La'an - which has the much weaker plot of getting & loosing a connection, is the one where you actually experience her feelings through her acting.

(Writing was also a factor. But still.)
I actually think there is a lot of Early Season 1 TOS Kirk in the seemingly stunted emotional range. Kirk was very buttoned up, to the point where he would explosively lose his cool (usually with Bones). In particular, there is even a discussion with Spock in enemy Within where Spock outright tells him it's important to the crew that he appear infallible.

I thought he was a bit flippant but any diversion from TOS Kirk could plausibly be explained by it not being TOS Kirk. I would commend Wesley for upping his game though. I could definitely feel like I was watching Kirk - even the hair was giving off vibes.
 
It's a poor casting choice. Wesley is more Jeffrey Hunter than he is William Shatner. Shatner played every scene with passion, and his Kirk in TOS was really a jerk ha ha. No really, he was demanding, impatient, sneaking, daring, and incredibly controlling. The Wesley Kirk is way too tame. Maybe it's the right actor for a "background James T." but the guy who commands The Enterprise (Shatner) is someone who has so much confidence and bravado that it's inescapable.
 
I wouldn't say that Shatner's Kirk has excessive bravado. He's confident, yes. But he's also contemplative and deeply feels the weight of his responsibility. The "brash playboy bouncing around the galaxy boning alien babes" persona is more a creation of years upon years of pop-culture parody.
 
As played by Paul Wesley, this version of Kirk isn’t a larger-than-life hero; instead, he feels like someone you know. Or, better yet, someone you might aspire to be like.

... “If you actually watch The Original Series, yes, there’s some exaggerated stuff there, but for the most part, Kirk is pretty down-to-earth,” Wesley explains. “He’s not like the caricature people think of, or as big as people have made him out to be in their heads over the years.”

Link
 
The people asking for more “alpha” type behaviour from Kirk would unironically be the first to protest about “privilege “.
 
On the Ready Room Wesley says the season is about Kirk's growth towards the character we see in TOS. He comes across as having a good idea of Kirk's trajectory.

Interesting, well we shall see. Furthermore, the lad needs to eat a few more hotdogs! James T. Kirk needs some more girth!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top