Maybe, but Kirk's only ~27 at this time (current, non-time travel SNW), not 33...and Wesley's 40. Shat at 28:Shatner looked older than Kirk's canonical age of 33 in Season 1 of TOS. They don't need to do anything to Paul Wesley.

Maybe, but Kirk's only ~27 at this time (current, non-time travel SNW), not 33...and Wesley's 40. Shat at 28:Shatner looked older than Kirk's canonical age of 33 in Season 1 of TOS. They don't need to do anything to Paul Wesley.
Surprise - Wesley doesn't look like Shatner!Maybe, but Kirk's only ~27 at this time (current, non-time travel SNW), not 33...and Wesley's 40. Shat at 28:
![]()
Shatner looked older than Kirk's canonical age of 33 in Season 1 of TOS. They don't need to do anything to Paul Wesley.
So this week, we won't be really discussing the episode in question I guess.
Instead we will be sitting from the sidelines as fools drag out videos of Jim Carrey doing a Shatner impression on SNL.
It's as if actors playing roles that are older or younger than their actual age is a new thing... Some people. Nitpickers gonna pick nits I guess.
Instead we will be sitting from the sidelines as fools drag out videos of Jim Carrey.
Hilarious if naive.He's never going to be the lead of this show, so all he has to be is an effective supporting character.
This a problem?So Kirk in 2260 is just a Lieutenant
Under 5 years till he becomes Captain?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.