People have had no compunctions about going after her family in their efforts to destroy her...and there's something very wrong and very un-American about that.
You know nothing of history then. That's been happening since the beginning.
People have had no compunctions about going after her family in their efforts to destroy her...and there's something very wrong and very un-American about that.
People have had no compunctions about going after her family in their efforts to destroy her...and there's something very wrong and very un-American about that.
You know nothing of history then. That's been happening since the beginning.
I actually don't remember much about the family. Just Bristol, that got brought out all the time with her now ex......But disagreement is so NOT an excuse to go after someone's family.
Oh, it would be so nice if the Republicans run her in 2012. And it's possible. It's most probably going to be a year for a Right-Wing sacrificial candidate.
When SHE made the decision to thrust her unwed, pregnant teenage daughter into the spotlight by accepting the nomination then she loses the "moral high ground" of complaining about media coverage. She KNEW what would happen and she did it anyway. If she DIDN'T know what would happen then that is even more evidence that she was woefully unprepared for national office.If that were strictly on a policy level, I would completely agree. But making YOURSELF a public figure does NOT mean your family automatically loses all rights.
The Democrats do tend to win in the big states like CA and NY.
When SHE made the decision to thrust her unwed, pregnant teenage daughter into the spotlight by accepting the nomination then she loses the "moral high ground" of complaining about media coverage. She KNEW what would happen and she did it anyway. If she DIDN'T know what would happen then that is even more evidence that she was woefully unprepared for national office.If that were strictly on a policy level, I would completely agree. But making YOURSELF a public figure does NOT mean your family automatically loses all rights.
When part of her political ideology involves abstinence and her oldest daughter is knocked up, it's bound to be mentioned once or twice.When SHE made the decision to thrust her unwed, pregnant teenage daughter into the spotlight by accepting the nomination then she loses the "moral high ground" of complaining about media coverage. She KNEW what would happen and she did it anyway. If she DIDN'T know what would happen then that is even more evidence that she was woefully unprepared for national office.If that were strictly on a policy level, I would completely agree. But making YOURSELF a public figure does NOT mean your family automatically loses all rights.
The fact that you think you DO get the right to condemn someone's family when someone runs for office speaks far more about you than it does about her. By far.
You're wrong. I get the right to comment on her bad judgment. I haven't condemned her family. Get your facts straight before spouting off.When SHE made the decision to thrust her unwed, pregnant teenage daughter into the spotlight by accepting the nomination then she loses the "moral high ground" of complaining about media coverage. She KNEW what would happen and she did it anyway. If she DIDN'T know what would happen then that is even more evidence that she was woefully unprepared for national office.If that were strictly on a policy level, I would completely agree. But making YOURSELF a public figure does NOT mean your family automatically loses all rights.
The fact that you think you DO get the right to condemn someone's family when someone runs for office speaks far more about you than it does about her. By far.
When SHE made the decision to thrust her unwed, pregnant teenage daughter into the spotlight by accepting the nomination then she loses the "moral high ground" of complaining about media coverage. She KNEW what would happen and she did it anyway. If she DIDN'T know what would happen then that is even more evidence that she was woefully unprepared for national office.If that were strictly on a policy level, I would completely agree. But making YOURSELF a public figure does NOT mean your family automatically loses all rights.
The fact that you think you DO get the right to condemn someone's family when someone runs for office speaks far more about you than it does about her. By far.
In her first interview since giving birth, the teenage daughter of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said having a child is not "glamorous," and that telling young people to be abstinent is "not realistic at all
It's true. Someone I know on Facebook was all about how it wasn't fair for Palin, and how her family was targeted and Obama's was ignored, and I was like 'They were taking shots at Michelle Obama the whole time, even Palin took shots at her. And if he had an adult pregnant kid that he put in front of the camera to promote his positions all the time I'm sure that kid would've come up just as much.'Not saying anyone here has, but it definitely goes on that one side says family is off limits, then turns around and targets the opposition's family as if they were fair game. It's quite common in the news, particularly biased news reporting.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.