I'm going to check Fox News. This sounds like one of those stories that necessitates the red and white flashing "ALERT!" at the bottom of the screen.
They should do something original, 2001 already had a space Muslim.
![]()
She makes me want to pray towards Mecca.They should do something original, 2001 already had a space Muslim.
![]()
It looks like we'll be getting a Muslim character in the new Trek after all. And apparently he's gonna be a badass!
I hope you didn't think I was saying anything to the contrary. I agree wholeheartedly.That's true. Not everyone associated with Star Trek had the virulent, spiteful attitude towards religion that Roddenberry showed. Hell, even he didn't show it very much early in his career... it mainly came during his "dope smokin' and coke snortin' 70's" phase. Several of the key players in TOS Trek were actually quite devout in their faith. For that matter, several people associated with TNG were as well, though it was less prevalent then (for reasons which would drag this thread off topic entirely).I don't know...at the end of Bread and Circuses, Uhura and the rest of the bridge crew certainly seemed to understand who the "Son of God" was.
My point... Trek wasn't ALWAYS stridently anti-faith, and not everyone involved in Trek was stridently anti-faith. Just a few (admitted fairly LOUD) voices... in a pretty large choir.![]()
As goes the chior director, so goes the choir.
I don't care whether the charecter is the devout muslim, or if we get to hear him chant a prayer. If done right, it might be tasteful. I'm just not keen on making him the "token muslim" where every scene is about him being a muslim. I've seen those kinds of characters way to often to be impressed by them -- the gay character whose entire life is ZOMG I'm Gay, the black sidekick in action movies who only seem able to wisecrack, that kinda stuff isn't good storytelling in my opinion. If he's a captain, and he's a muslim yet also a well rounded character, that would work.
Agreed. The entire audience finds that sort of "beat them over the head with preachiness" approach to be obnoxious.I kinda always ignored it when Trek characters tried to knock religion. It reminds me of the episode (I think it's Long Ladder) where Riker says something like humans are more evolved now and we don't eat meat. Give me a break.![]()
I kinda always ignored it when Trek characters tried to knock religion. It reminds me of the episode (I think it's Long Ladder) where Riker says something like humans are more evolved now and we don't eat meat. Give me a break.![]()
I hope you didn't think I was saying anything to the contrary. I agree wholeheartedly.That's true. Not everyone associated with Star Trek had the virulent, spiteful attitude towards religion that Roddenberry showed. Hell, even he didn't show it very much early in his career... it mainly came during his "dope smokin' and coke snortin' 70's" phase. Several of the key players in TOS Trek were actually quite devout in their faith. For that matter, several people associated with TNG were as well, though it was less prevalent then (for reasons which would drag this thread off topic entirely).
My point... Trek wasn't ALWAYS stridently anti-faith, and not everyone involved in Trek was stridently anti-faith. Just a few (admitted fairly LOUD) voices... in a pretty large choir.![]()
As goes the chior director, so goes the choir.
I don't care whether the charecter is the devout muslim, or if we get to hear him chant a prayer. If done right, it might be tasteful. I'm just not keen on making him the "token muslim" where every scene is about him being a muslim. I've seen those kinds of characters way to often to be impressed by them -- the gay character whose entire life is ZOMG I'm Gay, the black sidekick in action movies who only seem able to wisecrack, that kinda stuff isn't good storytelling in my opinion. If he's a captain, and he's a muslim yet also a well rounded character, that would work.
I'd like a character who the audience, generally speaking, won't NOTICE the "unique character bits" about... unless (as in this case) you're a muslim and notice him wearing some small item, saying some small phrase, or so forth.
A similar example would be a Catholic helmsman who might briefly "cross himself" before steering the ship into some near-suicidal situation. Nothing OVERT, nothing that would be distracting... just something that lets those who are familiar with this gesture recognize it.
South Asian would be more accurate than Middle Eastern, if referring to the actor. What his character turns out to be like is, as you say, another story.I don't doubt however that Tahir's character may be obviously of Middle Eastern descent, but I don't know if they will identify the character with any particular religion.
Trek was never anti-faith, stridently or otherwise, some inept and preachy dialogue in TNG notwithstanding. Anyone contending it was really hasn't paid very close attention.My point... Trek wasn't ALWAYS stridently anti-faith, and not everyone involved in Trek was stridently anti-faith. Just a few (admitted fairly LOUD) voices... in a pretty large choir.![]()
Yes... that's exactly correct. And part of that means "different beliefs."So uh, he won't be shouting "Allah Ackbar!" as he flies his ship into an enemy space station?
No seriously...I think this is cool. Trek is supposed to be a utopian future where people from all cultures, sexes, "races", and even species work together...so![]()
Yes, you are right...and I did correct that in my next post. In fact some - including myself - say Southwest Asia when speaking of Pakistan, Afganistan, and surrounding countries -- although Southwest Asia is what most people commonly call the middle east, and does not normally include Pakistan and Afganistan, as you have correctly pointed out.South Asian would be more accurate than Middle Eastern, if referring to the actor....
Knock the racial slurs off, right now.Very controversial.I hope he does not talk with that jarring Pakistani accent.
How will Middle America react to this brown bread,post 9/11?
You make baby Jesus weep.Atheism is every bit as much of a "religion" as any other religion. So atheism denies the existence of God (something which must be taken on faith, obviously).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.