The logo for Humanism looks like the inverse of the Starfleet logo on each side (forming a human shape)
Sadly, lots of fans today know nothing about NASA.I think most ST fans can logically deduce that...
I just always assumed it was the NASA logo. It's a short trip from a diagonal delta to the Starfleet emblem.
Why is anyone still trying to argue points?
If you didn't want to hear others' opinions on this, why are you contributing to the thread? Just write up an essay and post it to your blog or something.Why is anyone still trying to argue points? Before the Federation Starfleet was United Earth Starfleet and before that was NASA!
To you, yes. To me & a few others, not so much. I've got a BFA in graphic design and I'm a graduate of the Kubert School, so I know what I'm talking about when it comes to design elements. I've already outlined why I think the arrow element is just as likely a coincidence as an intentional homage.The logo is obviously derived from the NASA Red Chevron and that symbolic meaning has already been explained .
Yes, but your supposition doesn't automatically mean that it's a fact. If you can dig up some quotes from Roddenberry, Matt Jefferies, or William Ware Theiss saying, "Oh, yes, we totally based the Starfleet arrowhead on the NASA symbol," then you have something. Until then, it's just your personal theory.No offense. It's just that 2 pages of theory vs logic of spaceflight history and what Gene had to go off of in the '60s doesn't seem helpful.
Gentlemen, you can't speculate in here! This is a discussion forum!Why is anyone still trying to argue points? Before the Federation Starfleet was United Earth Starfleet and before that was NASA!
Hmm... this from the guy who based his first faulty assumption (key word) on a non-canonical ST novel based on warp tech?
Man, I already told you that I agree with you that it was probably inspired by the NASA logo (possibly among other aerospace agencies and corporations), and that was my position from the start, but your absolute insistence on shutting down all other speculation and discussion is so annoying that I now want the answer to be something else just for shits and giggles.
I like to hear other people's ideas. I'm sure others do too. Stop being a killjoy.
"I agree with me, and if you were me, you would, too."Every Trekker purist I've every met agrees.
For crying out loud, I was talking about an in-universe explanation that I thought was a neat bit of speculation. How are you not getting this?No one buys the non-canonical ST book ref to Cochrane's warp tech explanation which is chronologically further along.
If you want to consider purely "inuniverse," it looks more like the current Chinese national space agency symbol than the American. Maybe that's where it (inuniverse) came from?The logo is obviously derived from the NASA Red Chevron
I know it's an old thread but old is good....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.