I think what he meant is -- we're all a bit dorky and innocent, but Han is cool. He gets to say the funny lines and be with the purdy girls. Han is a rogue. If you've read or seen Campbell, then you know: there are always archetypal heroes and then those who are helping the hero. Sure, they can be heroic, but the very nature of the hero is for the hero to have a journey, to overcome. Those who aren't are expendable - they don't have to grow or even continue living. I think, no matter your feelings about TATV, we've been shown Trip is not essential. Again, I'm using hero as Campbell would.I like Joseph Campbell a lot too, but having Luke Skywalker as this archetypal kind of hero doesn't mean that Han Solo ain't one as well.
In fact, to paraphrase Peter Jackson: "Most of us were Luke at heart, but we all really wanted to be Han Solo."
Uhm, yeah. It is.I beg your pardon? He was undoubtedly the most skillful and ingenious member of the crew. That's not even a matter of opinion.
No, but the writer did. By that I mean, there was a blank slate and they chose Archer to get the katra because he is the Campbell-type hero.Arev (Syrran, whatever) didn't have much of a choice, did he? That katra was not something he earned.
Okay, so why did you think it was a great episode? Why do you think it showed adoration between Trip and T'Pol, so much so that Sussman is to be praised?Wasn't that intentional? Weren't we supposed to feel sorry for him? By the end of that ep, Trip was officially the biggest loser in the universe.
When I feel sorry for someone, I don't typically feel romantic. I felt Trip cared about T'Pol, but didn't feel she cared for him the same way. And I guess the reason I didn't like Home is I got tired of feeling Trip was the biggest loser in the universe instead of clever guy with a mission like he was in the first two seasons - a la my Trip thread.