I know we're all supposed to think that OJ killed Nicole and Ron. I never followed the original trial that closely, so I don't know. But think of this: What if - bear with me here - he really *didn't* do it? What would happen if there came some new, actual, real, conclusive proof that he was innocent? Would we all be willing to eat that much crow? Or would people refuse to accept any new evidence that proved him not guilty, no matter how reliable it might have been?
I am well aware that it's next to impossible that we'd ever get such evidence. I'm just speaking hypothetically here. It's just that I'm a bit disturbed that it's become so easy to hate OJ.
This latest trial, on the other hand, seems fairly cut and dried. He committed armed robbery and was sentenced accordingly. Although it is very likely that part of the reason he got such a sentence was out of revenge for the original murders. There's no way that the jury could have ignored that. Anybody other than OJ would probably have not gotten such a long sentence.