That's not the question. We were talking about taking every statement in Star Trek to being the literal truth and the characters speaking as we do.
Number One's Character Development
- Thread starter david kelly
- Start date
And I was just pointing out that there is a lack of practicality in taking that position.
Which position? Anti literalism? We're talking about art and language. Both are full of things not to be taken literally. Because they deal in symbolism. This isn't holy script, it's art. And it doesn't have to be practical.
