For a time my impression was Spock was his only name.
Well, it couldn't be his last name otherwise his father would have been named Spock too.
For a time my impression was Spock was his only name.
I agree, but I'm a fan of Burning Dreams as well. It's a really nice extrapolation of Pike, and one of the best Star Trek novels I've ever read.I like the broad strokes of Crew and Marvel's Early Voyages on giving us more of the Pike and pre TOS era. Toss in DC Fontana's Vulcan's Glory to tantalize us with what adventures in the Pike era could be like.
Why are you apologizing to Christopher? The novel was written by Margaret Wander Bonanno.Sorry, Christopher, but I didn't care for Burning Dreams.
Six inches shorter than Shatner, would have gotten his vote.My vote has always been for Eartha Kitt
My take is that Spock is neither his first nor his family name. I think that Spock is basically his "public" name. There's a family name and a given personal name, both difficult to pronounce.For a time my impression was Spock was his only name.
My take is that Spock is neither his first nor his family name. I think that Spock is basically his "public" name. There's a family name and a given personal name, both difficult to pronounce.
That would depend on Vulcan naming customs and preferences. They may have a name used publicly or professionally.Well, it couldn't be his last name otherwise his father would have been named Spock too.
Sarek and all the other Vulcans we meet in TOS also call him Spock. I think the Kohlinar master in TMP does too.I always suspected that Spock was his "human" name. The name he's called by humans.
Sarek and all the other Vulcans we meet in TOS also call him Spock. I think the Kohlinar master in TMP does too.
Who's "they"?I think it's sort of dubbed, IE they call him by his name on Vulcan but since wouldn't be able to hear it as it sounds, they translate it to his human name for our benefit.
Who's "they"?
The Vulcan Master says his a couple of times, in the Vulcan language.
It's pretty close to the human pronunciation.
Humans learned to pronounce them, after a fashionWhat happened to the words that are unpronounceable, in your opinion?
Like many statements in real life, not everything a character says on Star Trek is to be taken literally.AMANDA: Amanda. I'm afraid you couldn't pronounce the Vulcan name.
KIRK: Can you?
AMANDA: After a fashion, and after many years of practice. Shall we continue the tour? My husband did request it.
We can't pronounce certain words in foreign languages without intensive training. Sometimes you need to be born to the language to be able to pronounce certain syllables. What makes you think we could do better with alien languages?Humans learned to pronounce them, after a fashion
Like many statements in real life, not everything a character says on Star Trek is to be taken literally.
I'm only referencing how Star Trek handled it. But as you say, practice would help and a flair for language will too. Though I've a feeling actual alien languages would be much more exotic than anything we can imagine.We can't pronounce certain words in foreign languages without intensive training. Sometimes you need to be born to the language to be able to pronounce certain syllables. What makes you think we could do better with alien languages?
I'm only referencing how Star Trek handled it. But as you say, practice would help and a flair for language will too. Though I've a feeling actual alien languages would be much more exotic than anything we can imagine.
The hell you say!Humans learned to pronounce them, after a fashion
Like many statements in real life, not everything a character says on Star Trek is to be taken literally.
...
Like many statements in real life, not everything a character says on Star Trek is to be taken literally.
What can mean anything?That can mean anything.
What can mean anything?
The characters in Star Trek are not a bunch of literalists. They speak as we do in real life, employing metaphor, exaggeration, humor and simile to express ideas
Context These statements do not exist in a vacuum. There is body language, vocal inflection and facial expression. If you watch the scene with Amanda and Kirk you will get the context. Much as we do in real life.But in that case what is the point of having any discussion like this. If each time you say something that's contrary to what has been said, you can invoke the "they were exaggerating/dissimulating/misremembering/lying through their teeth" rule?
Context These statements do not exist in a vacuum. There is body language, vocal inflection and facial expression. If you watch the scene with Amanda and Kirk you will get the context. Much as we do in real life.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.