• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Poll No one gets out alive...

Who will die by end of Season 1?


  • Total voters
    84
I wanna say when they started releasing it on DVD the first time...then I was wondering if it was used in the Encyclopedia.
 
If it was used in the first edition of The Star Trek Encyclopedia, then it goes back at least as far as 1994. (I have the second edition on hand.) The original DVD releases in 1999 bore the retronym...don't know if that would have been the first time it was used in merchandising.

In my experience, it definitely wasn't around in the '80s after TNG came out. It was common to refer to TOS as "Classic Trek" back then.
 
If it was used in the first edition of The Star Trek Encyclopedia, then it goes back at least as far as 1994. (I have the second edition on hand.) The original DVD releases in 1999 bore the retronym...don't know if that would have been the first time it was used in merchandising.

In my experience, it definitely wasn't around in the '80s after TNG came out. It was common to refer to TOS as "Classic Trek" back then.
1994 sounds about right, I remember using Classic Trek during the first couple of seasons of TNG and when DS9 started TOS was definately already around
 
If it was used in the first edition of The Star Trek Encyclopedia, then it goes back at least as far as 1994. (I have the second edition on hand.) The original DVD releases in 1999 bore the retronym...don't know if that would have been the first time it was used in merchandising.

In my experience, it definitely wasn't around in the '80s after TNG came out. It was common to refer to TOS as "Classic Trek" back then.
I don't have it to hand (I think it's at my Mum's), but I had this from 1993

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Star_Trek_Chronology

I'm reasonably certain it was used in there as well. I'll try and dig it out next time I'm there.
 
I don't have it to hand (I think it's at my Mum's), but I had this from 1993

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Star_Trek_Chronology

I'm reasonably certain it was used in there as well. I'll try and dig it out next time I'm there.
Captains' Logs used both Classic Trek and Star Trek '66. At least in my German edition (first printing from 1994*).

*I don't know why Memory Alpha says the book was published in 1995 when my book - a translation nontheless - has 1994 as it's publishing date
 
DSC would be better if they knew how craft a decent, thematically-stable plot. But I digress. 'Cause this ain't the place to discuss that.
Stable show runner for an entire season would probably help... Speaking of which, is Michelle Paradise still employed on Discovery? :confused:
 
Captains' Logs used both Classic Trek and Star Trek '66. At least in my German edition (first printing from 1994*).

*I don't know why Memory Alpha says the book was published in 1995 when my book - a translation nontheless - has 1994 as it's publishing date
The second edition of the Chronology from 1996 uses it, so the the first likely did as well.

In 1991, I remember them being abbreviated ST and ST:TNG.

I think I first saw "TOS" used as an abbreviation either in 1993 through the first edition of the Star Trek Chronology or, I think Pocket Books was already calling it "Star Trek: The Original Series" by that point (not on the covers in front, but when they had the list of other novels they published in the series). If it helps as a point of reference, when I started recording TOS in 1992, I labelled the tapes "Star Trek: The Original Series".
 
You can make an argument that the endgame of the series is setting up for the death of any main character. Except for Raffi. She really doesn't have "nothing left to lose" and I think it's obvious they want to set up a multi-season redemption arc for her with her son/grandchild.
First season Tilly yes, second season Tilly no.
Agree.

About your three season and done comment, don't you kind of hope they kill this shit in season 3 so we want to see more of the future? I'd be disappointed if they did not do a fourth if they kill it in 3...

Lastly, off topic, I am listed as a red shirt, does that mean I am the first to die in whichever chat I am in?
 
I always had hoped that Jaime Lannister would've survived in 'Game of Thrones' as beneath his family name and evil deeds he had done earlier, he has many redeeming qualities, while I don't mind seeing Cersei died a very horrible death for all the evil things she did.

Alas, it didn't turned that way in GoT series finale (at least in D&D's interpretation). Here's hoping Narek, the 'Jaime' of the Picard-verse - would have had a much better fate :beer:.

Narek and Narissa are not quite Jaime and Cersei yet, there has only been a one way flirtation so far and no incest. I am hoping Picard is not going to be Ned Stark, especially since they already did that with Lorca on Discovery.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top