So (for my first post, no less) what I took out of the movie was that the Trek Prime timeline no longer exists. Reading here I get the feeling that everyone thinks it's an alternate timeline; I heard that much in the movie, sure, but I don't think that's what's happened. I'm pretty sure that, for all intents and purposes, everything from Trek that we know of no longer exists.
Not, mind you, that we're seeing an alternate timeline. No, that this is now Canon.
From a meta-plot POV, I think this holds up: The movie is supposed to revamp the franchise.
Movie: The creators go back in time, eliminate all the "logic" they don't need for this, and start fresh without having to quote Rodenberry unless they want to. Moreover, they use what came before as a guide on the journey forward, with obvious "there's differences" involved (example: scotty on the ice planet, surprising spock-prime)
Trek: Nero goes back in time, blows up Vulcan (the Logic-planet) and 6 billion Vulcans (Trek continuities). However, Spock rescues as many of the Vulcan cultural counsel as he can during the destruction (as many Vulcans as possible). Now Spock-prime is there as a guide for all the remaining 10000 existing Vulcans (the original show, the best of it, as a guide for what we have left).
I know it's a nice dream to assume that all your old merchandise is still continuity. However, as far as the Franchise is concerned... well, we're starting from scratch now. I think arguments to the contrary are lovely wishful-thinking, but I don't think it's realistic. I mean, it's not like the Ultimate Universe in Marvel with varient Earth's with Zombies, Ultimate and Prime continuities who can travel to meet each other.
I don't think that idea has punch, has teeth, and fits with Star Trek.
At least as I see it.
Not, mind you, that we're seeing an alternate timeline. No, that this is now Canon.
From a meta-plot POV, I think this holds up: The movie is supposed to revamp the franchise.
Movie: The creators go back in time, eliminate all the "logic" they don't need for this, and start fresh without having to quote Rodenberry unless they want to. Moreover, they use what came before as a guide on the journey forward, with obvious "there's differences" involved (example: scotty on the ice planet, surprising spock-prime)
Trek: Nero goes back in time, blows up Vulcan (the Logic-planet) and 6 billion Vulcans (Trek continuities). However, Spock rescues as many of the Vulcan cultural counsel as he can during the destruction (as many Vulcans as possible). Now Spock-prime is there as a guide for all the remaining 10000 existing Vulcans (the original show, the best of it, as a guide for what we have left).
I know it's a nice dream to assume that all your old merchandise is still continuity. However, as far as the Franchise is concerned... well, we're starting from scratch now. I think arguments to the contrary are lovely wishful-thinking, but I don't think it's realistic. I mean, it's not like the Ultimate Universe in Marvel with varient Earth's with Zombies, Ultimate and Prime continuities who can travel to meet each other.
I don't think that idea has punch, has teeth, and fits with Star Trek.
At least as I see it.