No Jurassic Park 4

[Australis]

^ No, really, Tuln and Tulin ARE two different people - I think Tuln had a different name until recently.

 

[bigdaddy]

we are 2 diff people

You are never receiving my help again.

And good luck with your degree, because "you are going to need it."

SHouldn't you be spreading God's will somewhere else for a change? Maybe in your cult?

 

[Squiggy]

Mark my words.

A true Christian would have refused the role of Damien Thorn in The Final Conflict on the grounds that it is exploitive and goes against God and Jesus Christ. However, Sam Neill had no qualms in accepting such a role, so I do not support any of this man's projects or ventures.

There is nothing in his biography that states that he is a Christian or is a believer of almighty God, so he is just a low, filthy actor who would have the audacity to portray satan on screen to boost his profile.

Cubby Broccoli was wise not to cast him as 007. Imagine Damien Thorn uttering the lines "Bond...James Bond" on screen while ordering a vodka martini "Shaken, not stirred."

And, come to think of it what is Daniel Craig doing portraying the devil in an upcoming film?

Pagan actors who will regret it when their time comes.

They serious need to repent in order to be saved.

He also would've turned down the role in Jurassic Park because it portrayed the insane notion that dinosaurs died 65 million years ago when we all knew it was 2,000 years ago.

 

[Good Will Riker]

^ No, really, Tuln and Tulin ARE two different people - I think Tuln had a different name until recently.

Thank you for pointing that out.

I mean that.

Truly, man.

we are 2 diff people

You are never receiving my help again.

And good luck with your degree, because "you are going to need it."

SHouldn't you be spreading God's will somewhere else for a change? Maybe in your cult?

Listen to the mod, and cut that out.

Mark my words.

A true Christian would have refused the role of Damien Thorn in The Final Conflict on the grounds that it is exploitive and goes against God and Jesus Christ. However, Sam Neill had no qualms in accepting such a role, so I do not support any of this man's projects or ventures.

There is nothing in his biography that states that he is a Christian or is a believer of almighty God, so he is just a low, filthy actor who would have the audacity to portray satan on screen to boost his profile.

Cubby Broccoli was wise not to cast him as 007. Imagine Damien Thorn uttering the lines "Bond...James Bond" on screen while ordering a vodka martini "Shaken, not stirred."

And, come to think of it what is Daniel Craig doing portraying the devil in an upcoming film?

Pagan actors who will regret it when their time comes.

They serious need to repent in order to be saved.

He also would've turned down the role in Jurassic Park because it portrayed the insane notion that dinosaurs died 65 million years ago when we all knew it was 2,000 years ago.

Like the mod said, there is no reason to bring that up anymore.

So, drop it.

 

[Bishbot]

^ No, really, Tuln and Tulin ARE two different people - I think Tuln had a different name until recently.

Thank you for pointing that out.

I mean that.

Truly, man.

SHouldn't you be spreading God's will somewhere else for a change? Maybe in your cult?

Listen to the mod, and cut that out.

Mark my words.

A true Christian would have refused the role of Damien Thorn in The Final Conflict on the grounds that it is exploitive and goes against God and Jesus Christ. However, Sam Neill had no qualms in accepting such a role, so I do not support any of this man's projects or ventures.

There is nothing in his biography that states that he is a Christian or is a believer of almighty God, so he is just a low, filthy actor who would have the audacity to portray satan on screen to boost his profile.

Cubby Broccoli was wise not to cast him as 007. Imagine Damien Thorn uttering the lines "Bond...James Bond" on screen while ordering a vodka martini "Shaken, not stirred."

And, come to think of it what is Daniel Craig doing portraying the devil in an upcoming film?

Pagan actors who will regret it when their time comes.

They serious need to repent in order to be saved.

He also would've turned down the role in Jurassic Park because it portrayed the insane notion that dinosaurs died 65 million years ago when we all knew it was 2,000 years ago.

Like the mod said, there is no reason to bring that up anymore.

So, drop it.

Yeah, there wasn't any sane reason to bring it up in the first place. Are you really surprised that people won't let it drop?

And to keep it on topic:

"God creates dinosaurs. God destroys dinosaurs. God creates man. Man destroys God. Man creates dinosaurs."

"Dinosaurs eat Man... Woman inherits the earth."

I've no idea if that has any relevance or not. But its an exchange I've always enjoyed.

 

[Good Will Riker]

^^^^

The mods gave a warning, and if you want to keep it up, by all means -- go ahead.

However, in all honesty, I do stand by my principles in regards to my moral views.

 

[Flying Spaghetti Monster]

I did have a different name. I had reasons to change it but didn't realize that Tulin was another name out there.

Anyway, I do agree that such a religious point was stupid to bring up in this topic for many reasons. Narrow-minded, bigeted, and inappropraite for a thread about JP, and I'll let it rest at that

 

[bigdaddy]

^^^^

The mods gave a warning, and if you want to keep it up, by all means -- go ahead.

However, in all honesty, I do stand by my principles in regards to my moral views.

Here is a hint, being so close-minded as you are you might not get this, the mods here think you are a wacko, and also wonder why you are a freak who brought up lame bullshit in a JP thread.

 

[Good Will Riker]

^^^

Why you do not receive a warning for flaming in continuing this discourse while insulting me with a barrage of inane vulgarities, when the moderators have told us to discontinue and get back on topic, while I certainly would receive a warning for doing the very same as you is beyond me.

Behave, and get back on topic.

 

[Kirkman1987]

*looking at the off-topic rants and arguments*

"You see.... The members of trekbbs follow no form of standard etiquette or repeated Moderator warnings.....The essence of Chaos."

 

[Roger Wilco]

Behave, and get back on topic.

How 'bout you do that you wanna be mod?
How many of your last 10 or so posts in this thread were on-topic? (hint: none)

You're a troll if I've ever seen one.

 

[trekkerguy]

I think they should give JP a rest, maybe another 5-10 years and come back if Spielberg will do it and make another. I don't want to see another that he isn't doing.

While the first film is very entertaining, the second is dire - the worst film Spielberg has ever made in my opinion. Joe Johnston's Jurassic Park III wasn't as good as the first film, but it was a significant step up from The Lost World.

I... well I'll just say I strongly disagree. That's all.

 

[Kirkman1987]

^

I think Lost world is a little better than III. It's a pretty good movie until the climax, which is ridiculous. It also has way too much humor incorperated into it. That kid is annoying too.

If you have the dvds, I believe they include storyboards for the original climax, wherin the survivors escaped using hangliders, whille being chased by flying dinosaurs.

The storyboards for the first film feature some more violent stuff as well. I could be wrong, but I believed they storyboarded Grant fight the raptors with the giant crane like in the book.

III is alright, It's a great popcorn film. With such a great concept and the awesome dinosaur FX, I don't think a Jurrassic Park film could ever be unwatchable.

 

[Good Will Riker]

Behave, and get back on topic.

How 'bout you do that you wanna be mod?
How many of your last 10 or so posts in this thread were on-topic? (hint: none)

You're a troll if I've ever seen one.

Have you ever read the sign at the zoo?

It says "Don't feed the monkey!"


( )

 

[trekkerguy]

^

I think Lost world is a little better than III. It's a pretty good movie until the climax, which is ridiculous. It also has way too much humor incorperated into it. That kid is annoying too.

If you have the dvds, I believe they include storyboards for the original climax, wherin the survivors escaped using hangliders, whille being chased by flying dinosaurs.

The storyboards for the first film feature some more violent stuff as well. I could be wrong, but I believed they storyboarded Grant fight the raptors with the giant crane like in the book.

III is alright, It's a great popcorn film. With such a great concept and the awesome dinosaur FX, I don't think a Jurrassic Park film could ever be unwatchable.

Well, I liked the way Lost World ended, and I did like III. It just didn't have the same edge-of-your-seat feel the first two had, and like I said before was essentialy using the scraps left of the story by the first two films.

There are parts of Lost World I enjoy more than the first, but overall my favor of them goes... I-II-III. lol.
And I loved the humor of Lost World, each one had something that set it apart for me and the humor was welcome in the setting and cast of Lost World, at least for me.

No JP film would ever be unwatchable.

 

[Kirkman1987]

With my comment concerning the Humor in the Lost World, I didn't make myself clear. I'm fine with the humor throughout the film (well, besides the really cheesy lines) I just think the ending in particular has some really over the top stuff, like the japenese tourists and the scene with the dog.

Speaking of the Lost World, I always found it really weird that Hammond's kids were so excited to see Malcolm again. I don't think Malcolm even once talked to the kids in the original.

 

[MyCylon]

^

 

[jkladis]

Mods can tolerate only so much. Don't pile on.

To that end, watch closely, gang, because here's an example of when a mod has seen enough. This could happen to you!

Behave, and get back on topic.

How 'bout you do that you wanna be mod?
How many of your last 10 or so posts in this thread were on-topic? (hint: none)

You're a troll if I've ever seen one.

Have you ever read the sign at the zoo?

It says "Don't feed the monkey!"


( )

If you're truly serious about your message, you should be taking the higher ground. Instead you're going to prod everyone?

Nah. This thread is a failure. You get the warning.

Closed