The things I don't like are mostly picky things. I don't like the uniforms at all. I don't like the look and the "formality", but mostly I don't like that they don't look like they evolved from anything that had been seen before. And I hate that officer and enlisted uniforms were separated into completely different designs. The concepts just don't seem plausible.
One thing I very much dislike is the ranking system.
I think there was something excellent about William Ware Theiss' original Star Trek ranking system, in that it was simple, but elegant in that simplicity. At a glance,
any viewer can tell easily by the TOS uniforms what rank an officer is, what department he or she works for, and where he or she belongs in the command structure.
You know, those arm braids were *all* they needed. Even the TNG uniforms (which were again designed by Theiss, of course) were brilliant in this way, because again they made the rank structure
simple to understand. Four pips, three pips, two pips and a half pip, it was very basic, but completely plausible.
I confess: I never understood the movies ranking system.
I find the ranking system developed for TWOK and used in all of the TOS movies entirely obtuse.
All those little medallions and trinkets on people's arms and on the flap fastener. All the "bling".
Sure, it's probably more
believable, as a proper military ranking system. But I think it loses a little something. It doesn't have the immediate simplicity of TOS's arm braids or TNG's collar pips.
First and foremost, Star Trek is an entertainment medium. And as such it needs to be accessible to any audience member, no matter their, um, level of perception.
Some details, like the rank structure on the uniforms, are IMO better done in "broad strokes" rather than all the fiddly details that the TWOK-TUC uniforms present us with.
I found it insulting when Robert Fletcher claimed in an interview that Star Trek uniforms didn't have a proper rank structure before he created the TWOK costumes.
Maybe it didn't, maybe TOS had a simplistic ranking system. But I challenge Fletcher's assertion that this was in any way a
bad thing.
