So now we infiltrate Capaldi's social circles and find out which acquaintance of his who acts is talking about a large role to have just come her way but isn't talking about what it is.
Okay, on a more serious note, anyone thinking we might get an announcement say Thursday, before everyone goes on long weekend for Easter. "And now Doctor Who's new companion, who you won't meet until next Easter."
Rita: This is Jahannam.
The Doctor: You’re a Muslim!
Rita: Don’t be frightened.
The Doctor: You think this is hell?
Rita: The whole 80s hotel thing took me by surprise though.
The Doctor: All these fears and phobias, wandering about. Most of them completely unconnected to us. So why are they still here?
Rita: Maybe the cleaners have gone on strike.
The Doctor: Ha. I like you. You’re a right clever clock. But this isn’t Hell, Rita.
Rita: You don’t understand. I say that without fear. Jahannam will play its tricks and there’ll be times when I want to run and scream, but I’ve tried to live a good life and that knowledge keeps me sane, despite the monsters and the bonkers rooms.
I'm still counting on a penguin....
It's possible, I guess. I personally would prefer the Christmas special to be completely stand-alone with a guest companion, like RTD did. It's all we're getting for the year and we have wait a few months after for the season itself. Plus, it'll make the season more accessible if it's not picking up where the previous Christmas special ended off. In fact, I had actually forgotten quite a bit from The Snowmen by the time The Bells of St John aired, so I'd like not to repeat that experience.You don't think the new companion might show up at Christmas?
RTD's first Christmas special had the ongoing companion. And only two of Moffat's have had the ongoing companion in the companion role. (I'm phrasing it like that to omit "A Christmas Carol" - yes, Rory/Amy were in it, but they were just cameos, not companions.) There's not a big difference in approach between the two in terms of cast.I personally would prefer the Christmas special to be completely stand-alone with a guest companion, like RTD did.
But they weren't connected, so why was that a problem?Plus, it'll make the season more accessible if it's not picking up where the previous Christmas special ended off. In fact, I had actually forgotten quite a bit from The Snowmen by the time The Bells of St John aired, so I'd like not to repeat that experience.
But that was because that special was introducing a new Doctor. Which, I suppose is a bigger deal than introducing a new companion. Still, it was handled in a manner that nothing in season 2 really drew on much from The Christmas Invasion.RTD's first Christmas special had the ongoing companion.
While those two episodes aren't themselves connected, The Snowmen is integral in setting up the arc of the second half of season 7, only by the time that started airing I had forgotten most of the important details from The Snowmen, which added some frustration to watching those episodes which wasn't really alleviated until I did get the chance to rewatch it. Of course, it also didn't help much that the DVD of The Snowmen wasn't released until after the season finale aired.But they weren't connected, so why was that a problem?![]()
Agreed, it is unfortunate Amy and Rory had a reduced role in A Christmas Carol, but in the case of The Doctor, the Widow and the Wardrobe they technically weren't the Doctor's companions at the time, and for all we know Moffat might have written it thinking the characters were done. It allegedly did take some arm-twisting to get Karen Gillan and Arthur Darvill to agree to just the first half of season 7. Maybe their cameo at the end of the special was written after it was confirmed they would be back?I found it rather irritating that, whereas Amy & Rory were almost entirely written out of A Christmas Carol and The Doctor, the Widow and the Wardrobe, Clara was allowed to totally dominate The Snowmen, The Time of the Doctor and Last Christmas.
Considering they abandoned their plan to make Clara from Victorian times (a decision which required re-writes to several episodes) it's clear someone doesn't want companions from different time periods, let alone other planets.A non-human companion would certainly be a nice change, as we seem so far to only have had British women from the early 21st century (and all but Amelia were from some part of London) instead of the Time Lords, Alzarians and Trakenites of the Classic Series.
I don't follow. What is this clean slate idea and when was it done?I'm not too keen on making the "clean slate" idea into a fixed rule (so far it's only happened once, of course) since I don't want the show-runner to be seen as supremely powerful over every tiny aspect of the series, with each transition forcing arcs, themes and relationships to dissolve like a demise of the crown. In particular I think a lot of the Moffat era (especially Series 6.2 and 7) might have been better if someone else had been on hand to hold him back a little.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.