• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

New 2017 titles and blurbs - DTI, McCormack DS9, and more!

He wrote the Vulcan one too, and while flipping through it I saw that it does have several novels cited as references in the back.

Though I also spotted one fairly big contradiction in the Vulcan guide. Still, as the book itself notes, it doesn't necessarily apply to any particular universe, timeline, or reality of the Star Trek universe. Novel references are flavor, not a binding attachment to the continuity.
 
I wouldn't want to call Doug Drexler 'shoddy', because it is unfinished. But certain covers (the klingon one you mention) were ineffective. It's weird because DD is very talented. One way I think of them is that they are very aware of their own mediality and aren't meant to be realist - including his Fall covers which I loved but which were very deliberately and overtly CG paintings.

I don't think Drexler is shoddy/untalented, but he needs to stop using people in his designs. Just look at the Patterns of Interference cover. Either go back to hand-drawn/painted covers or stick to non-actor shots; that PoI cover looks beautiful without Trip shoehorned into the foreground.

Three months in the release schedule without a novel, a demonstrable decline in cover quality...what's next? Every book bound the way A Choice of Futures was?

The Trek line needs to be cared for much more effectively moving forward, especially if CBS's big expectations for Discovery are justified.
 
Yes, well said. Thats something I've been trying to put my finger on for some time.

Pocket needs to care for the Star Trek book line much more than it currently seems to.


I long for the days of Marco Palmieri, the early DS9 Relaunch, crossovers with the comics, the publication of Voyages of the Imagination, a healthy ebook line, awesome book covers, and between 12-15 books per year.

We're a long way from those days. :wah:
 
I loved the elaborately painted covers of the early TNG novels that were reminiscent of pulp sci-fi almost.
See "Power Hungry" or "Strike Zone"
 
Well, when it comes to the schedule, we do need to remember that Discovery kind has things in flux right now. We have a slow down in the Voyager books because DSC hired Kirsten Beyer so that gave us one of the gaps. I can't remember for sure if the DSC book was separate from the rest, so it being pulled might be the second gap. They also appear to be avoiding the 23rd century, so that also limits things.

Honestly, I'm not that concerned with the occaisional gaps in the schedule. Most other tie-in lines only do 3 or 4 a year at most, so the fact that Pocket has managed to give us 12 books a year, most years, for as long as they have and that they've managed to keep fairly consistent high quality, is pretty damn impressive. I'm not going to let one or two years with a some gaps concern me.
Now, the bad covers on the other hand.... there's no real excuse for those.
 
Last edited:
Also TOS had half the slots last year, so I can kinda forgive the lack of TOS this year.
 
Well, when it comes to the schedule, we do need to remember that Discovery kind has things in flux right now. We have a slow down in the Voyager books because DSC hired Kirsten Beyer so that gave us one of the gaps. I can't remember for sure if the DSC book was separate from the rest, so it being pulled might be the second gap. They also appear to be avoiding the 23rd century, so that also limits things.
And there's also the 24th century slowing down before they reach 2387, and the minor incident that year contains. Trek novels do have a lot of limitations at the moment.
 
I'm so glad we're finally getting another Story With Ben Sisko again it's been long overdue. I'm looking forward to getting this Ds9 book.:biggrin::techman:
 
Gorgeous cover

ds9cover_updated.jpg


At the end of 2385, in a significant shift of its goals from military back to exploratory, Starfleet sent Captain Benjamin Sisko and the crew of the U.S.S. Robinson on an extended mission into the Gamma Quadrant. Tasked with a years-long assignment to travel unknown regions, they set out to fulfill the heart of Starfleet’s charter: to explore strange new worlds, and to seek out new life and new civilizations.
But now three months into the mission, their first contact with an alien species comes in the form of an unprovoked attack on the Robinson. With the ship’s crew suddenly incapacitated, seventy-eight of the 1,300 aboard are abducted—including Sisko’s daughter, Rebecca. But Rebecca had already been kidnapped years earlier by a Bajoran religious zealot, part of a sect believing that her birth fulfilled the prophecy of the arrival of the Infant Avatar. Does her disappearance now have anything to do with the harrowing events of the past? And for what purposes have these enemies taken Sisko’s daughter and the rest of the missing

Well done Defcon on being right! Thank you for your good work.
 
Nah, late 2385+3 months sounds pretty much concurrent to the beginning of The Long Mirage.
I think he means that we'll be getting the details on, or a flashback to, Rebecca being kidnapped during the time-skip. Which is probably a good thing, since it was such a big driver of the unpopular directions Sisko's character was taken for a while.
 
More dilution though.
A DS9 slot where (judging by the blurb) the station and it's new crew are mostly sidelined.
People then grouse about how they know little or cannot connect with the new characters.
 
I think he means that we'll be getting the details on, or a flashback to, Rebecca being kidnapped during the time-skip. Which is probably a good thing, since it was such a big driver of the unpopular directions Sisko's character was taken for a while.
Ohh, you're right, that would be great!
 
Sounds good. I'm glad we'll be getting at least one Sisko centric novel in the near future.
I hope it does fill in the Rebecca kidnapping story from the time gap, I think that is one of the most significant things we haven't seen yet.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top