So by lost they mean...photoshopped versions of pics we've all seen before?
Just imagine if the "lost" photos were Photoshopped JJ-Trek heads on TOS bodies, while using TOS-R Enterprise...
I'd rather not...

So by lost they mean...photoshopped versions of pics we've all seen before?
Just imagine if the "lost" photos were Photoshopped JJ-Trek heads on TOS bodies, while using TOS-R Enterprise...
It's nice that there is a magazine devoted to the original series, but for hardcore fans, this will be a letdown. None of the articles (except for a Kirk/Pike comparison credited to Larry Nemecek) have bylines and there are numerous errors. According to the magazine, "The Trouble with Tribbles" was the season 2 opener. I'd list more, but I don't want to steal Harvey's thunder.
It does have some nice photos I'd never seen before. Some behind the scenes stuff on "The Cage" and a photo (with an incorrect caption) of Nimoy, Montaigne and Shatner relaxing between takes on the set of "Amok Time".
Neil
I like the pic of the camera crew working around the "Rocky Knoll" set of the Cage with the caption:
"IT TAKES A VILLAGE: For the production of "The Cage," the southern California desert became the planet Talos IV--known as Clesik to its native inhabitants."
Oh brother. Where do they get this crap?
The book couldn't be that dumb.
At least the pages are thick and gloosy and solid.
I like the pic of the camera crew working around the "Rocky Knoll" set of the Cage with the caption:
"IT TAKES A VILLAGE: For the production of "The Cage," the southern California desert became the planet Talos IV--known as Clesik to its native inhabitants."
For clarification, that's a joke, right? The book couldn't be that dumb.
I like the pic of the camera crew working around the "Rocky Knoll" set of the Cage with the caption:
"IT TAKES A VILLAGE: For the production of "The Cage," the southern California desert became the planet Talos IV--known as Clesik to its native inhabitants."
For clarification, that's a joke, right? The book couldn't be that dumb.
Yeah, it is that dumb...and the long past its shelf life "It take a village" line did not help matters.
It's that blueprint that gets me.
It's a new take, at least, if not less.
Now it might be CBS only has rights to the series, not the movies.
Were I to have a magazine--I might call it Starfleet In Action.
The magazine would be wide, like CINEFEX, and nothing but shots of ships throughout the series.
Very little on the NX-01, then Doomsday Machine, Balance of Terror, Enterprise Incident--several stills from ST:TMP, ST II and especially ST-III.
Probert's Enterprise C, Wolf 359 and Way of he Warrior, and one or two from Voyager.
That's what I'd like to see--with perhaps most ship pix from ST III.
We got Ken Ralston in the latest Trek magazine.
In the concept I was talking about--maybe some drawings of concepts from all the artists.
And--sorry guys--not one actor in the magazine at all--the polar opposite of what we are getting.
Ships of the line isn't enough for me.
Where crap normally comes from -- pulled out of someone's ass, apparently.Oh brother. Where do they get this crap?
Where crap normally comes from -- pulled out of someone's ass, apparently.Oh brother. Where do they get this crap?
Where crap normally comes from -- pulled out of someone's ass, apparently.Oh brother. Where do they get this crap?
Unfortunately, the internet has allowed for lazy research to become far far more easier.
"Lost photographs"? Certainly not the one on the cover. I've run across that pic dozens of times.
Well, this is for sure. However this picture has been photoshopped (I've never seen a picture of Spock pointing directly to the camera). This is the original one: as you can see, Kirk's and Spock's eyes, and Spock's hand have been altered.
Maab
So by lost they mean...photoshopped versions of pics we've all seen before?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.