Nebraska Grey alien film
- Thread starter voggmo
- Start date
What scientific analysis? - I'll keep repeating this until it sinks in - the only think that scientific analysis could prove is that the tape is real and has not been altered. It cannot provide any evidence of the reality of aliens.
What scientific evidence? So far all we have is the word of this guy and bunch of mysterious scientists and researchers. Using logic, it doesn't sound like this guys story is true. If he said he was video taping the window because he thought it looked nice in the dark, would you believe him just as much? I'd hope not.
Hey guess what, I've discovered that if you stand inside your trash can for over an hour an alien space ship will visit you! I even have video! Dogs were digging through my trash, so I decided to start hiding inside the can to see what the problem was. Unfortunately every time I popped out to surprise them, the garbage was everywheres and there was no sign of the dogs! After the two hundredth time I decided to consult some local scientists who told me I should video tape myself! I caught a strange saucer shaped object in the video! I tried it in trashcans all accross the country with the same result! I can't show you the video tape though because I have agreements with the scientists not to show the video until they've examined it.
Hey true believer, you'd better stand outside in your trashcan and start gathering some hard scientific data!
I'm all for having an open mind, but this story strains that to the limit. The failure of logic in his story makes me believe it's a poorly thought out hoax, and that's how I'm going to approach it.
The indepth science that supports the it doesn't "sound" right theory. Where is it?
As for the guy who shot the film, he had the proffessor of filmography from Colorado University analyze the film. And is currently having scientists do further work on it. You've already been told this. Shall I repeat it till it sinks in?
Jerry Hufmann, a professional video producer and an instructor at Colorado Film School, said he believes that the alien video had not been altered in any way and the "being" did not look like a puppet or part of any special effects.
http://disclose.tv/action/viewphoto/...indow_Picture/
Joe said...
"and bunch of mysterious scientists and researchers."
Nothing mysterious at all about this researcher, using logic one can see the above post is complete hogwash.
As for the guy who shot the film, he had the proffessor of filmography from Colorado University analyze the film. And is currently having scientists do further work on it. You've already been told this. Shall I repeat it till it sinks in?
Jerry Hufmann, a professional video producer and an instructor at Colorado Film School, said he believes that the alien video had not been altered in any way and the "being" did not look like a puppet or part of any special effects.
http://disclose.tv/action/viewphoto/...indow_Picture/
Joe said...
"and bunch of mysterious scientists and researchers."
Nothing mysterious at all about this researcher, using logic one can see the above post is complete hogwash.
Last edited:
I'm not the one talking about in depth science. I explained my reasoning for being skeptical and none of it requires that I be told what my opinion should be by a guy with a title. The fact that these researchers have asked him to hold from showing the video to the public makes me suspect their credibility. I would suspect their findings too if there actually were any. You keep talking about the science, but all you really have is the word of this one guy who has a story that isn't logical. Someone talking about possibly scientific study isn't the same as science.
The world is full of half baked scientists, professors, and researchers. A lot of my friends are professors, so I can tell you the title doesn't necessarily mean they know shit. A researcher can be any nutjob ufologist on the web that decides to give themselves the title. The same goes for a scientist and anyone that gets a degree. Those infomercials for healing magnet bracelets and de-ionized water are full of wild claims from such scientists and professors. There is hours of footage out there of all kinds of scientists and experts talking about crop circles, and how this and that is impossible in nature. In the end it turned out to be a couple of dunkards with boards and rope, and the stalks didn't break because they were limp from lack of light.
So yeah, I don't take the words of random scientists as gospel. Not that there were actually any claims directly made by any. All you have at the moment are the claims of this one guy, who looks to cash in from this and doesn't have a story that makes sense, and claims from a film professor who can only say that the film didn't seem altered. Since he isn't a professor of puppeteering that part of it is kind of pointless.
So tell me, does his story make sense to you?
The world is full of half baked scientists, professors, and researchers. A lot of my friends are professors, so I can tell you the title doesn't necessarily mean they know shit. A researcher can be any nutjob ufologist on the web that decides to give themselves the title. The same goes for a scientist and anyone that gets a degree. Those infomercials for healing magnet bracelets and de-ionized water are full of wild claims from such scientists and professors. There is hours of footage out there of all kinds of scientists and experts talking about crop circles, and how this and that is impossible in nature. In the end it turned out to be a couple of dunkards with boards and rope, and the stalks didn't break because they were limp from lack of light.
So yeah, I don't take the words of random scientists as gospel. Not that there were actually any claims directly made by any. All you have at the moment are the claims of this one guy, who looks to cash in from this and doesn't have a story that makes sense, and claims from a film professor who can only say that the film didn't seem altered. Since he isn't a professor of puppeteering that part of it is kind of pointless.
So tell me, does his story make sense to you?
You keep talking about the science, but all you really have is the word of this one guy who has a story that isn't logical.
No, we have the film analysis done by the aforementioned pro. Your assertion just doesn't hold water in view of this fact. You say it isn't logical, but provide no science to support this assertion.
"A lot of my friends are professors, so I can tell you the title doesn't necessarily mean they know shit"
This is why the film is being currently analyzed by more scientists. The process of science again takes time. Just how it is.
It is being handled correctly & is going through the process of science. How can you criticize the fact of it going through the process of science as being uncredible?
The view you are expressing is that you have little faith in the film pro. Faith has no place in science.
No, we have the film analysis done by the aforementioned pro. Your assertion just doesn't hold water in view of this fact. You say it isn't logical, but provide no science to support this assertion.
"A lot of my friends are professors, so I can tell you the title doesn't necessarily mean they know shit"
This is why the film is being currently analyzed by more scientists. The process of science again takes time. Just how it is.
It is being handled correctly & is going through the process of science. How can you criticize the fact of it going through the process of science as being uncredible?
The view you are expressing is that you have little faith in the film pro. Faith has no place in science.
Last edited:
