It doesn't matter what their written policies are if the corporate culture fosters flaunting the written policy, or if the company isn't actively enforcing it's own policies.
Having recently saved an epileptic pug from drowning by jumping into a swimming pool in my street clothes
I justThe cries for beating the offender to death, etc, are so over the top/ridiculous they are laughable. Doesn't mean the full weight of the law shouldn't visit this animal, but talk about his bloody murder only lowers this thread to the level of a grade school playground discussion which understandably irks others involved in the thread -- including the moderators. This is the end of that extreme sort of hyperbole.
In Massachusetts he would go to jail for longer than if you killed a human.
If it's in writing, then that's the policy. Since I live in Oklahoma, I'll say I'm familiar with some of the policies and procedures of various companies especially since I've interacted with members of the various trades. Each of these people has told me that their instructions are to not enter the yard, or exit the vehicle for rural property, if they deem there to be a dangerous animal on the premises. That covers gas, electric, cable, and propane.Not really, no. Cause he could have been under orders to enter the yard, in violation of any policy. Happens all the time in my neck of TN: The utilitiy company has a policy that meter-readers are not to enter an enclosed yard (animals or not) without the owner present or a liability waiver on file; they hop the fences and open the gates all the time when it comes time to read the meters- regardless of if there is a waiver or not. Complain on them and you'll get "We'll review the complaint and take appropriate disciplinary action" and never another word about it will be said.I'll bet ONG has explicit procedures laid out in training and the employee manual that state service personnel are not to enter a yard where animals are deemed a threat. So overall, the company has protected itself and the guilty meter reader is fully at fault. Again, suing the company is needless and counter-productive.
So they may have a written policy, but their active-policy, what they do, might not be what they have in writing.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.