• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

my NUKE TREK reboot

And when I say 'reboot' I mean...well...instead of rebooting your computer? Taking it outside having a big-rig truck run it over seven million times...that kind of reboot..

here is my totally new STAR TREK

The TV show would depict events happening only fifty years in our future. It would center around man's first manned mission to mars. the one they are actually planning now...

The crew would go up there to mars and build a basic base that they will in turn have to live in for 18 months until coming home...

The first several episodes would introduce us to the crew before they even leave. Setting up the backstories as to who and what they are...but you get the picture. The crew of that ship will no doubt be multi-national, just like TOS was, in terms of humanity.

Captain Kirk. His family has been growing crops in Iowa for over a hundred years. But this son, James, became one of NASA's most decorated pilot/shuttle commanders. He will be in command of the mission.

Doctor McCoy. Also an American. His ability to think fast on his feet in medical emergencies is what the Mars program likes the most about him. He isn't the smartest Doctor..just the best.

Sulu...The Chinese pilot of the vessel.

Chekov. The Russian Navigtor.

Scott. The engineer who happens to hail from scotland.

Uhura; the communications officer who comes from Kenya or whatever.

And S.P.O.C.K. It is the the A.I. computer that will sheppard their journey. It also has a unique program that allows it to converse logic arguments with the captain, but also accept the human's arguments as well.

The first season of the show will be set-up. The midway point of season one will be the actual launch.

The remaining first season will deal with the six month flight to mars. And will end with them arriving at the space platform that is in orbit of mars. They will enter the lander and head to mars for the next part of their mission; landing on mars and building the space lab with the supplies that were sent ahead of them.

The show would not have any sentient alien life forms at all. No more bumpy headed aliens of the week. Just real science problems. Oh, they may find plant life, dangerous bacteria, things like that…but no Klingons or Vulcans. This really means; more part of our real world.

There is nothing wrong with those kinds of Treks, meaning what has come before, but this show would strive for more realism. And since the mission to mars will soon become something in our near future, this show would hopefully inspire a new generation of youth to perhaps want to be part of that undertaking.

I know it sounds pedestrian. I know it seems small in scale. But I think a more hands on approach, a show that the viewers actually think could happen, and soon, would be very successful.

So why call it Star Trek? Very simple You could use those iconic names; Kirk-Spock, but in a totally new way.

And, I would even go so far as to say this. After season three, and the Mars plots have been used, you could start the fourth season twenty years later. Advances in technology have made it possible to travel to the closest star. A new crew (Picard, Riker D.A.T.A) would staff that vessel…And maybe they might, once they get there, find some kind of sentient life. But that life would have to be something other than pirate like Klingons and walking computer zombies.

That is my total “NUKE STAR TREK” idea. Yes, it is very drastic. And yes, most of the current fan-base would never go for it. But if done with care and with the over riding goal of being depicted as ‘just beyond our finger tips’ in terms of the science in the stories, I think I could work. It would obviously be the end of STAR TREK as we have known it for over 40 years.

Where would the morality plays come in, which are so much apart of Roddenberry’s creation? The writers would find a way to deal with our issues. But I think the formula of watching bumpy headed aliens deal with issues that we face, but cloaked behind strange planet names and slightly different looking humanoids, has reached a point of saturation. Over 600 hours of that kind of story telling has been created. It would take you five weeks, non-stop, to watch all of them.

Okay…I will put on my bullet proof vest, and try my best to dodge the objects that will soon be thrown my way.

Okay, there is my NUKE TREK idea. Lets say JJ's TREK crashes and burns. I don't think it will, but what if it does. And say that in about 10 years Paramount hired you to bring Star Trek back...what would you do? What would be your strategy to give TREK a new life. You have read mine...what would be yours?
 
The biggest problem with this kind of show is the biggest problem with sending men to Mars - what do they actually do for all that time?

It will take a year to get there and during that time what you are likely to get is just slightly stir crazy astronauts.

I think you need a slightly fictionalised capability to allow them at least to run into trouble every week.

Now a mini-series about the first manned mission to Mars? Sounds good.
 
Well, the show would be like the other shows. Each episode could take place two or three weeks after the previous episode. But yeah, I see your issue. It would be one big BOTTLE show. Not much going on except ship board problems. So I guess you could show the preamble stuff (setting up crew on earth for several episodes) then the trek Mars (maybe three episodes or so) then the arrival at mars and all the problems they may face getting to the planet..

Then building the base, maybe finding water...microbotic life, intermixed with 'personal' drama of the crew...

Could this go on for three years? no..but they (writers) could use that as a starting point...but with the goal of keeping it a show that is based more on real tech and real attainable ideas. No warp speed or Transporters.

Yeah, those things are what sets trek apart from other shows. But instead of warp speed you have Ion drive to get you to the next star..maybe they come up with some tech to approch the speed of light in later seasons...who knows. But the basic idea of this ALL NEW STAR TREK would be to start all over..and I mean all over. Use the template of the characters, tweek them, and just retell another version of TREK in the same way Moore did with BSG.
 
i give you credit for coming up with something original, but sorry I don't like the idea much. Basically, it just doesn't sound like an interesting show. There's no imagination involved. It's just people going to space, and that's it. There's no adventure, and thats what people want to see. Who cares if it's realistic or not. People don't watch scifi for realism. Just because it has the name star trek doesn't mean that it'll work. Star Trek was built around telling adventure stories in the future and imagining what the future would be like, and yes, they probably got it wrong, but it's about a positive vision of the future not necessarily about envisioning the actual future.

BTW, George Takei is Japanese not Chinese.
 
You know, I don't think it's a bad idea. Sure, there are possible dramatic problems others have mentioned, but a good writer could rise above those. Mostly, I'm worried that it's called Star Trek at all. You've moved on so far from the original material that it seems like you should take that to the next logical step and eliminate Star Trek from your idea all together. That's just my two cents.
 
If Star Trek just puts out another show with different bumpy headed aliens confronting our contemporary issues it will fade away like VOYAGER and ENT did, IMO.

With over 600+ hours of Trek told in that form, people just started to get the impression, rightly I might point out, that they were running out of ideas...they did
 
^If they are out of ideas, then they should just let the franchise rest and call it a good run.
 
I think it should have ended at DS9, IMO. I liked aspects of Voyager, the actors and such...but the writing got rough at the end.

But yeah, a rest is do.

But then again..maybe not. The problem was sticking with a formula and not trying to stay ahead of the game. New writing was needed, but more importantly, a new look perhaps..and new feel
 
Two problems:

So why call it Star Trek? Very simple You could use those iconic names; Kirk-Spock, but in a totally new way.

Why? Names are not crucial to a show; writing is. As I see it, there's really no reason whatsoever to set this in the Star Trek universe--unless you feel it won't succeed without the Trek brand name on it.

Where would the morality plays come in, which are so much apart of Roddenberry’s creation? The writers would find a way to deal with our issues.

"Let the writers handle it," is not an answer to the problem. You have created a premise that would be extremely difficult to write for; if you want me to buy into it--and I see no reason for you to care what I think, but meh--you're going to have to show me how the show could survive on a week-to-week--not season-to-season--basis.

Kudos for coming up with a radical new idea. It needs something that makes it distinctively Star Trek and a lot more polish before it graduates from "vague concept" to "solid premise."
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top