It's just an opinion, but I think it's ill advised to use Star Trek to build up your streaming service, because while the fanbase for Star Trek is big, vocal, & net active, it was also historically not able to keep some shows on the air because of how easily broken up it can get. Of any cross-section of self-proclaimed Star Trek fans, you find all manner of people who get different experiences from it, with different tastes, some of whom don't even like all of the shows, & of those, can't even agree upon which shows are the ones that are more likable. I could grab 5 of any of you here, & it's exceedingly likely none would agree which show is the best & what constitutes a poor Star Trek production, & that's the core fan base.
That's not necessarily a bad thing, of course, but it does hold potential for divisiveness. Couple that with the fact the most success Trek ever had was on tv, or in cinemas, when it had its broadest appeal among people who aren't die hard fans. So the problem with restricting your viewership should be abundantly evident. To be blunt, if you ask people to pay outright, you lose cheap people. If you ask them to subscribe to a service, you lose lazy people, & if you operate outside of commonplace mainstream outlets, you cause confusion & lose ignorant people (Ignorant as it applies to Star Trek &/or media)
I got news for you. Those people who aren't die hard fans? whose (Not so insignificant) contribution brought Trek its broadest successes? Those people are cheap, lazy & ignorant. Add to that the fact that there's an easily accessible production out there that literally mimics Star Trek, & you can count on the cheap & lazy people thinking it's a better alternative, & risk the ignorant people not even knowing the bloody difference. lol. I don't even think this show can count on the die hard fan base all tuning in, because some of us object to their viewership restrictions on principle. We're patrons of Star Trek, not CBS, the more CBS chops up the thing we love on the chopping block, the more likely we're to pass. It's a stunt, a weak one, that shows the flop sweat of losing out to things like netflix
That's not necessarily a bad thing, of course, but it does hold potential for divisiveness. Couple that with the fact the most success Trek ever had was on tv, or in cinemas, when it had its broadest appeal among people who aren't die hard fans. So the problem with restricting your viewership should be abundantly evident. To be blunt, if you ask people to pay outright, you lose cheap people. If you ask them to subscribe to a service, you lose lazy people, & if you operate outside of commonplace mainstream outlets, you cause confusion & lose ignorant people (Ignorant as it applies to Star Trek &/or media)
I got news for you. Those people who aren't die hard fans? whose (Not so insignificant) contribution brought Trek its broadest successes? Those people are cheap, lazy & ignorant. Add to that the fact that there's an easily accessible production out there that literally mimics Star Trek, & you can count on the cheap & lazy people thinking it's a better alternative, & risk the ignorant people not even knowing the bloody difference. lol. I don't even think this show can count on the die hard fan base all tuning in, because some of us object to their viewership restrictions on principle. We're patrons of Star Trek, not CBS, the more CBS chops up the thing we love on the chopping block, the more likely we're to pass. It's a stunt, a weak one, that shows the flop sweat of losing out to things like netflix