• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

My "FIGHT" with Captain Kirk!

Star Trek shorthand. In TOS, they didn't need to spell it out with detailed explanations. Scotty knew what to do
It's not just about Scotty knowing what to do, it's about the audience knowing what Kirk is telling Scotty to do. If it's to detach the saucer section and allow the secondary hull to be destroyed, the dialog needs to say that. Kirk could tell Scotty to separate the saucer section, but he doesn't. He says jettison the nacelles.
 
I'd forgotten about this:


The Savage Curtain

KIRK: Scotty, inform Starfleet Command. Disengage nacelles, Jettison if possible. Mister Spock, assist them. Advise and analyse. Scotty? Scotty?

So apparently the nacelles can be disengaged and jettisoned as separate actions. But no mention again of any saucer section separation.
 
I'd forgotten about this:


The Savage Curtain

KIRK: Scotty, inform Starfleet Command. Disengage nacelles, Jettison if possible. Mister Spock, assist them. Advise and analyse. Scotty? Scotty?

So apparently the nacelles can be disengaged and jettisoned as separate actions. But no mention again of any saucer section separation.
Now we have to think about what these 1960s writers thought of as "nacelles," not what we fans think of today, in an age Starfleet ships live by a decades-known set of established terms.

Google returns this for "define nacelles":
1. a streamlined housing or tank for something on the outside of an aircraft or motor vehicle.
• the outer casing of an aircraft engine.
• the car of an airship.

They thought "nacelles" included the secondary hull. It IS a casing held to the saucer by a pylon. "Jettison the nacelles," to those writers, just meant "Get away in the saucer" I'll betcha.

Also, in "The Apple," Scotty says "We're losing potency in our antimatter pods." By that he meant the two obvious warp engines that we call nacelles. [I had to learn, years later on this very board, that aircraft guys call engine housings pods.] So that's another data point, meaning the engines only, without the secondary hull, go by "pods."
 
I'd forgotten about this:


The Savage Curtain

KIRK: Scotty, inform Starfleet Command. Disengage nacelles, Jettison if possible. Mister Spock, assist them. Advise and analyse. Scotty? Scotty?

So apparently the nacelles can be disengaged and jettisoned as separate actions. But no mention again of any saucer section separation.
In this case, jettison the nacelles was in response to:
SCOTT: I can't explain it, sir, but the matter and antimatter are in red zone proximity.
KIRK [OC]: What caused that?
SCOTT: There's no knowing and there's no stopping it either. The shielding is breaking down. I estimate four hours before it goes completely. Four hours before the ship blows up.
This also assumes that the matter and antimatter reactions are in the nacelles, only, and not in the secondary hull. It's always vague with this show. :shrug:
 
Now we have to think about what these 1960s writers thought of as "nacelles," not what we fans think of today, in an age Starfleet ships live by a decades-known set of established terms.

Google returns this for "define nacelles":


They thought "nacelles" included the secondary hull. It IS a casing held to the saucer by a pylon. "Jettison the nacelles," to those writers, just meant "Get away in the saucer" I'll betcha.

Also, in "The Apple," Scotty says "We're losing potency in our antimatter pods." By that he meant the two obvious warp engines that we call nacelles. [I had to learn, years later on this very board, that aircraft guys call engine housings pods.] So that's another data point, meaning the engines only, without the secondary hull, go by "pods."

Great call! Additionally, in "Tomorrow is Yesterday," the writers had a USAF fighter pilot describe the Enterprise as a UFO with "two cylindrical projections on top, one below." That may also support the idea of saucer separation and your theory about the inclusive meaning of nacelles.
 
A couple of years ago I was at The Star Trek Original Series Set Tour for a Shatner event. When I visit my friends there, I love to help out with the guests and stay out of their way. I didn't expect to have a "fist fight" with William Shatner!Normally my friend John Carrigan Does the honor, but John was unable to attend. While waiting outside the entrance to engineering ,out of the way of the guests, I hear my name called! James Cawley came out to meet me and said...You're Fighting Captain Kirk!So there I was standing in front of Mr. Shatner as he explained to the guests how he would Kick my butt!We did it twice that day. The second time Mr. Shatner and I waited for the guests to move on to the bridge.He then said to me, you did a good job. I said thanks! He then said John Carrigan would have fallen on the floor! I said, OK, next time I'll do that! Mr. Shatner looked at me in my full Starfleet uniform and said, No, I wouldn't want you to dirty that tunic...It looks expensive!A great memory! Luck would have it that several of the guests sent me these images as I was too busy acting!To do this, in full uniform, in engineering on the Starship Enterprise, acting a fight scene with William Shatner was a very surreal event indeed!





To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Wow. What a great story and moment for you. I hope you got some pictures or video so you can reminisce in the future. 😊
 
Last edited:
It could. We just never saw it. Kirk mentioned it on screen in The Apple.

"Discard the warp drive nacelles if you have to and crack out of there with the main section."
Separating the saucer section was also mentioned as a possibility in TOS writer's guide, but it would have been expensive to film so they never did. Besides, the saucer would have had no warp drive, so they'd be marooned wherever they were unless they could get a subspace message out, and the engineering hull would lack a transporter room and probably phasers.
 
They could have other Transporter Rooms which all rely on a central gizmo that's eff'd up.
If they did, whichever hull had the central gizmo would have been the only one with a working transporter in the event of hull separation.

Also the never showed or referred to a second transporter room in the -1701 Enterprise.
 
If they did, whichever hull had the central gizmo would have been the only one with a working transporter in the event of hull separation.

Also the never showed or referred to a second transporter room in the -1701 Enterprise.
You're entirely right, but after a hull separation the Connie with multiple Transporters would be no worse off than the Connie with one.

The Enterprise might be a lean, limited-layout vehicle with one Transporter. But that implies the crew has some other way to get off the ship, such as escape pods, because a six-pad Transporter would need 72 runs to evacuate 430 people. It would take an hour. OTOH, in a world of trade-offs and limitations, that hour is not necessarily a deal breaker. It's just not future-utopian, dreamboat perfect.

The Franz Joseph plan has no escape pods, and I can't imagine them anyway, but it has five 22-pad Emergency Transporter Rooms plus four six-pad rooms. That's 134 pads, and the crew can get away pretty fast. If anything, it seems like overkill.
 
You're entirely right, but after a hull separation the Connie with multiple Transporters would be no worse off than the Connie with one.

The Enterprise might be a lean, limited-layout vehicle with one Transporter. But that implies the crew has some other way to get off the ship, such as escape pods, because a six-pad Transporter would need 72 runs to evacuate 430 people. It would take an hour. OTOH, in a world of trade-offs and limitations, that hour is not necessarily a deal breaker. It's just not future-utopian, dreamboat perfect.

The Franz Joseph plan has no escape pods, and I can't imagine them anyway, but it has five 22-pad Emergency Transporter Rooms plus four six-pad rooms. That's 134 pads, and the crew can get away pretty fast. If anything, it seems like overkill.
How is being able to escape the ship in a hurry going to be a big advantage? Most of the time, the Enterprise is exploring someplace remote, and there would be no other ship around to pick up escape pods before their air ran out. Eventually they got shuttlecraft, but even with the shuttlecraft packed beyond it's rated capacity it would take many trips, and unless they were incredibly lucky there's not much of any place to go with it that would be safer than the ship.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top