Not in the least.Definitely not a show that competes well on a dramatic level with modern TV.
Why not enjoy both?The Orville vs. Disco stuff gets tiresome. Fundamentally, I think the fandom divide comes down to what makes you think Trek was an entertaining franchise. If you're more into the "lore" aspects of Trek you'll be more into Discovery, which has "modern storytelling" but (at least in the first two seasons) heavily referenced earlier Trek. But if you enjoyed Trek because it was a framework to tell a certain kind of story, you'll be more partial to the Orville.
But if you enjoyed Trek because it was a framework to tell a certain kind of story, you'll be more partial to the Orville.
Why not enjoy both?![]()
I honestly have no interest in Orville, and having it brought up as some cheap alternative to real Star Trek developed by a comedian who has never demonstrated a single original idea, constantly on this forum, has only made me less inclined to give it any of my time. I need to watch less tv, not more. Star Trek for me is like pizza. Even when it's not great, it's still pretty good. And Discovery has been a damned good pizza. Orville can stay in the box and get cold.Why not enjoy both?![]()
And Discovery has been a damned good pizza.
did it avoid the Noid?At best, I find it comparable to Domino's.![]()
The Orville vs. Disco stuff gets tiresome. Fundamentally, I think the fandom divide comes down to what makes you think Trek was an entertaining franchise. If you're more into the "lore" aspects of Trek you'll be more into Discovery, which has "modern storytelling" but (at least in the first two seasons) heavily referenced earlier Trek. But if you enjoyed Trek because it was a framework to tell a certain kind of story, you'll be more partial to the Orville.
Same here. SInce I love Trek lore as well as the characters in DSC a whole lot DSC has a lot to offer.I'd say this is accurate.
At best, I find it comparable to Domino's.![]()
It depends on how you do themI make my own pizzas. Does that count as fan productions?
without violating CBS guidelines or harming tardigrades where possible.It depends on how you do them![]()
I have no problems enjoying both, however Orville gets the benefit of the doubt if things don't make sense as Star Trek is supposed to be somewhat more serious and as such it should really get its story straight.The Orville vs. Disco stuff gets tiresome. Fundamentally, I think the fandom divide comes down to what makes you think Trek was an entertaining franchise. If you're more into the "lore" aspects of Trek you'll be more into Discovery, which has "modern storytelling" but (at least in the first two seasons) heavily referenced earlier Trek. But if you enjoyed Trek because it was a framework to tell a certain kind of story, you'll be more partial to the Orville.
I'm the opposite. Star Trek gets the benefit of the doubt as not all their stories make sense. Orville is something new and had time to hook me in. First season almost got there and then didn't. Second season, same deal.I have no problems enjoying both, however Orville gets the benefit of the doubt if things don't make sense as Star Trek is supposed to be somewhat more serious and as such it should really get its story straight.
without violating CBS guidelines or harming tardigrades where possible.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.