It's definitely my favourite season of the revived series so far. Go Moffatt!
It's definitely my favourite season of the revived series so far. Go Moffatt!
Does it involve really, really silly looking Daleks?![]()
I don't think he made her watchable-- rather, he did the thing he always did when he wrote an episode for Davies, and he sidelined the companion character in favor of a companion surrogate of his own devising.It's definitely my favourite season of the revived series so far. Go Moffatt!
It's quickly becoming mine. I liked Moffat's contributions to Who, despite dislike Donna. (He made her watchable.)
I think overall I found RTD to be more self-indulgent with too many themes hammered home by repetitive dialogue and (#shudder#) hugging - we're British - what's with all the hugging (and the sudden glut of gayness - from famine to feast - yikes)?
Why is the presence of LGBT characters worthy of a "yikes?" Or a bad thing?
Steven Moffat has to turn this around or the show will be "rested" again.
Steven Moffat has to turn this around or the show will be "rested" again.
Eh? Has Series Five been suffering from inferior ratings?
I know how you feel - I've felt the same way for the past 4 years that Tennant's been the Doctor. Aside from a few stellar episodes - "Blink" and "Turn Left" come to mind (both Doctor-lite episodes BTW), I've found most of the 10th Doctor's episodes to be a big fat "Meh". I thought season 2 was so abysmal I almost gave up on the show. And aside from "Parting of the Ways", RTD's season finales have really stunk IMO. RTD can do cliffhangers, he just can't finish them without using the big ole reset button or something equally absurd.Doctor Who is about wonder -- this season has not been as imaginative or as original as RTD's efforts.
Doctor Who is about wonder -- this season has not been as imaginative or as original as RTD's efforts.
The Beast Below was dreary, depressing and had no internal logic.
Victory of the Daleks was part one to a second part that never came.
Time of Angels and Flesh and Stone completely reinvented and ruined whatever originality existed in the Weeping Angels.
Vampires in Venice was cliched and forgettable.
Amy's Choice was good, but nothing was ever at stake.
The Hungry Earth and Cold Blood was one contrivance after another, with again nothing at stake. Oh, Rory died? I'm sure he'll be in the finale. *YAWN*
The above episodes have not been awful, but they have not been good. All the other episodes have been fantastic. But . . .
No Waters of Mars. No Turn Lefts. No Utopia-level cliffhangers. No Blinks or Girls in the Fireplace. No Father's Days or Human Natures. No Empty Childs.
Meh. Where's my RTD? The genius who gave is Children of Earth Day 5 and Midnight? Who reinvented the show that so many fanboys envy/hate/resent and bash him for?
Oh yes, he's a CBE. Well done.
Steven Moffat has to turn this around or the show will be "rested" again. There have been no awful episodes but, yikes this season's been so timid and boring!
And as for this, horses for courses I know but I'm not actually a huge fan of some of those episodes. WoM was shite, 59 minutes of tiresome monster on the loose shenanigans to prepare us for the moment where the Doctor went bad...for oh about 5 seconds. Seriously it might have been quite good as a 45 minute mid season episode but as "event" telly it was lacking. Turn Left? I don't get the love, aside from Tate's performance this is the kind of alt universe telly sci-fi has been doing for yonks, and gives us nothing unexpected or new (unless Billie's shoddy portayal of Rose counts) No Girl in the Fireplace? Well that's an overated ep as well (see I can critique Moff too) Similarly Father's Day was annoying, and lacked any internal logic of its own as well if we're going to go there.No Waters of Mars. No Turn Lefts. No Utopia-level cliffhangers. No Blinks or Girls in the Fireplace. No Father's Days or Human Natures. No Empty Childs.
Steven Moffat has to turn this around or the show will be "rested" again.
Eh? Has Series Five been suffering from inferior ratings?
I think all this talk about "lack of emotion" simply boils down to the difference in Doctors. Tennant's Doc was emotional and friendly and full of joy. He was like a best buddy who you always want to hang out with and go on fun adventures with-- and that was reflected in the joyous, emotional spirit of the show itself.
Smith's Doc on the other hand is as strange and quirky and unpredictable as you can get. He's fun to watch, but, much like the original Doctors, not very easy to identify or connect with. So we kind of find ourselves watching from more of a distance.
There's definitely an adjustment that has to be made there, but personally I think it's worth it if it means we can have someone as brilliant and original as Smith as the Doctor.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.