Justin Turner back to the Dodgers, 4 years/$64M.
Weren't the Dodgers under orders to cut their payroll, or did the new CBA change this?
They're going to be making huge luxury tax payments soon, but the bigger issue is MLB's debt service rules -- teams are limited to carrying debt equivalent to no more than twelve times revenue minus expenses, but the rule is very selectively enforced and the commissioner's office can do anything from just looking the other way (this is the only reason the Wilpons still own the Mets) to taking over a team almost entirely (which Bud Selig did to Frank McCourt because he just didn't like him). The Dodgers ownership group is a close ally of Manfred and they were one of his earliest champions when the talk of Selig's successor first surfaced, so the most they'll have to deal with is a minor slap on the wrist (basically produce a document showing their contingency plans in case there were a debt crisis).
Anyway, 4 / 64 isn't a bad deal for Turner, although you do have to be a bit suspicious of a 32-year-old guy who just so happens to crank out career highs in, like, everything during his walk year.