• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Michael: The Movie

Shaka Zulu

Commodore
Commodore
The movie about Michael Jackson is coming out in April, and it will be in IMAX too, the trailer for which is here:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

So far, it looks amazing; what do others think?
 
Paging @Michael ;)

-

'From the producer of Bohemian Rhapsody' just makes me think about how even though that movie made a bajillion dollars, it's also a film that embraces the musical biopic tropes so hard that it almost feels like parody.

The dramatics of musical biopics don't really work for me (especially since Walk Hard) so I mostly only see them as long-form music videos now and disregard the frequently poor storytelling. (Same goes for Blues Brothers 2000 but that's another story.)
 
Last edited:
I loved the film, just as I enjoyed The Jacksons: An American Dream miniseries back in the day. I was saddened that Rebbie, Janet, and Randy allowed their grievances with the Estate to keep them from being showed on-screen, but since Michael and Joe were the primary focus of the story it was tolerable. I'm already looking forward to the sequel - Jaafar has publicly announced the filmmakers are not shying away from the allegations (probably will remain closed off about the Chandlers, though - June would probably want a large payday and script approval).
 
I saw this back in May. Actually enjoyed it more than I expected to. It's a fairly straightforward narrative backed by a killer soundtrack (I've said several times with films like this that you could get the same effect by reading their Wikipedia page whilst listening to their greatest hits) but as these kinds of films* go I thought this was one of the better ones. Helped by having an experienced writer and director, and Jackson's discography being so great doesn't hurt.

It sidesteps anything remotely connected to the allegations and settles for merely showing us that he was a little odd, that his lack of a childhood impacted him greatly, instilling in him an urge to seek alternative father figures because his own was so awful. It also seeks to explain why he sought friendship from children and animals, though the film really overdoes the Peter Pan allusions!

Jaafar is decent, I thought the kid playing little Michael was superb though. Domingo is a great actor, but Joe barely rises above the level of moustache twirling villain, and it's interesting to see he's the only person the film gives a rough ride to, and boy does it give him a rough ride (I know he was an absolute monster, just feels like the film channelled anything negative into him and went soft on everyone else, or just didn't mention then, I guess outside of a Ouija board Joe was the least likely to sue!)

There is a certain sick irony that the film goes into detail about how Michael was used to enrich Joe, and by extension the rest of the family, when here we have a film where Michael, even after death, is being used to continue to enrich the family.

I probably will watch any sequel though, especially if it commits to being a tad more controversial.

*For the record I think Rocketman is the best such biopic, it tries to do something a little different, and doesn't paint Elton John as either a victim or a saint, and given unlike most of these films John is still alive and was behind this film, certainly made him go up a notch in my estimation because it isn't always kind to him!
 
Jaafar worked himself to the bone for over 2 years to make his portrayal work. He'd never acted a day in his life, so the director first set him up with a coach and completely clueless fellow class members (their reaction is below). He was trained to break down scenes in various films, and analyze them to find out what made each character and actor tick. Simultaneously he set up an isolated room at Hayvenhurst, dancing and singing alone to try and channel Michael's spirit. He and Antoine Fuqua agreed that the end goal was not mimicry, but embodiment.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
It sidesteps anything remotely connected to the allegations and settles for merely showing us that he was a little odd,

Behind each of those "allegations" is a pending lawsuit.

The producers had to wade through a legal thicket to get the film made.



How Michael REALLY did "The Lean".

The man's stagecraft makes David Copperfield look like a rank amateur.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top