• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Meet the bridge crew of the USS Titan-A

We already know that Matalas absolutely wants to write/run that show and we will likely see this show try to operate as a backdoor pilot. He'll have enough elements there to be able to appeal to Kurtzman and whatever board he operates.

There are two three problems I see with this.

First thing, would a Captain Seven based show be different enough compared to the other shows we've got currently running? That is apparently Kurtzman's iron rule to try and appeal to many different fanbases.

We already have two directly ship based shows in Discovery and Strange New Worlds, one about the wacky adventures of lesser crewmen as a high jinks, high energy comedy and one about children and the joy of discovery and the dangers on the way. With Picard you have a sort of thickish veneer of a character study show but most of its plot beats have been about a rag-tag group of misfits solving Galatic Mysteries.

Each show is radically different. Would yet another Captain-on-a-ship show really be like that? Or would we have to scale down the theoretical Captain Seven show to a similar to Picard scale?

Second, would Paramount be comfortable overlapping Trek Universe shows? Right now there's a good, delicate balance of rolling shows throughout the year, would there be a risk of audience cannibalisation? Or would streaming make them more comfortable with this? We already know there's outline planning for at least two more Trek shows in the from of the Section 31 show with Michelle Yeoh which might be a compliment piece to Strange New Worlds, and the Star Trek Academy which we've speculated would be a good place for Mary Wiseman to show off her acting chops and would thus be a Discovery complimentary show.

Third, the wonderful problem of money. Each live action show is an $80-130 million question. Paramount is sinking probably the thick end of $300 million per year into Trek shows at the moment and thats with the stuff we have running right now! Is there space in a budget for another three shows operating on similar budgets?
Three things:

1. If Strange New Worlds ended (it won't), I wouldn't care. It's okay but it also feels like "been there, done that." I haven't looked at any of it since the season ended. And even there, I only watched each episode once. I haven't and am not planning to buy the Blu-Rays, whereas I do that with DSC and PIC.

2. While I would prefer that Discovery ran seven seasons, I would be okay with it ending after five. DSC has reached the point in its life-cycle where if it ended in Season 5, 6, or 7, I'd feel like, "I'm sad to see it go, but it had its run." So, due to the age of the series, I'd be okay with it ending too.

3. It's not about the setting, all the Star Trek series currently take place on a starship, it's about the characters. Are the characters different enough? We're talking about CBS here. They had how many Law & Order and CSI type of shows? Exactly.
 
We're talking about CBS here. They had how many Law & Order

L&O is NBC. ;)

Although it was originally a CBS show. The pilot episode ("Everybody's Favorite Bagman") and a few episodes were actually filmed for a season which was to air on CBS from 1989-90. This never happened, and NBC ended up getting the show. So those episodes were held back and aired on NBC in the actual first season (1990-91).

You can tell which first season episodes were CBS because they don't have the Doink Doink sound (and the onscreen text is a different font).
 
Last edited:
Season 3 is a backdoor pilot for a Seven led 25th century show.
There’s no evidence of that.


Geordi has TWO daughters serving on Titan (there's also Alandra LaForge, played by Levar's RL daughter Mica Burton).
I don’t think Alandra is on the Titan. It says she’s a ship builder. She’s probably working wherever her father is.
 
Last edited:
3. It's not about the setting, all the Star Trek series currently take place on a starship, it's about the characters. Are the characters different enough? We're talking about CBS here. They had how many Law & Order and CSI type of shows? Exactly.

Another reason why Seven is different from most other Captains in Starfleet: She spent a good portion of her career fighting on the ground.

She's used to fighting her wars up close and personal. She's an in-your-face grunt.
 
Field commission accepted and allowed her to attend a briefer stint at the Academy.

Seven at the Academy. Oh, I'd love to see that. :guffaw:

On a completely unrelated matter, I'm glad to see Todd Stashwick back. Not just because of his previous Trek work (Major Talok on ENT) but he's also played four different L&O roles. :techman:

Or she opened the right box of Cracker Jacks.

Take me out to the Academy
Take me out with the Collective
Buy me some peanuts and Cracker Jacks
I don't care if I never get back
So it's root, root, root for the xB
If she don't win it's a shame
For it's one, two, three drones you're assimilated
At the old Borg game
 
Last edited:
I think Matalas tweeted something about an accelerated command track that Seven wasn't entirely comfortable with.

Tell me they know nothing about how the military works IRL without telling me they know nothing about how the military works IRL. :rolleyes:

They could've said Starfleet gave her a direct commission and that would've been the end of it.
 
Tell me they know nothing about how the military works IRL without telling me they know nothing about how the military works IRL. :rolleyes:

They could've said Starfleet gave her a direct commission and that would've been the end of it.

Friend of mine has joined the Royal Navy... he's going in at a higher rank, but is stuck in the academy stuff for longer to get a better understanding of the crap he'll need to yell at/throw spanners at when it goes horribly wrong.

They really could've just let Picard throw in another favour-chip and trade it for a Borg First officer.

Well, to be fair, Seven's situation (being an ex-Borg) is absolutely unique.

Except for Icheb. Who was wearing a Red-Shirt when he died.
 
OT: Not crazy about SNW (It veers between camp and intense, gritty drama).

Camp: Crew enters a fairy tale!
Gritty drama: Child serves as battery for an entire planet! Una is arrested!

It doesn't quite know what it wants to say.
&
It's an adventure show. It says multiple things. Honestly, it's way more like TOS in that way.
What if TOS -- was made today? It's a fair topic for a reboot. And episodic can offer refreshing variety. But it's interesting to see both legacy canon heavy Star Trek fans and Discovery fans having problems with SNW's approach. These shows are just too expensive for hyper fragmentation, especially if the money spigot that's funded the streaming bubble slows and corrects.

SNW does make for a good juxtaposition to what a likely The-Next-Next-Generation would be. Is the future of the franchise really (Soft) reboots or moving forward? But, as a legacy Star Trek fan, SNW does "scare me" the most.

There’s no evidence of that.
It may not specifically be a Seven of Nine fronted show, but there's enough evidence that end of Picard season 3 sets up something that could be a follow up series.
 
&

What if TOS -- was made today? It's a fair topic for a reboot. And episodic can offer refreshing variety. But it's interesting to see both legacy canon heavy Star Trek fans and Discovery fans having problems with SNW's approach. These shows are just too expensive for hyper fragmentation, especially if the money spigot that's funded the streaming bubble slows and corrects.

You get SNW. That... that's it. SNW seems less canon breaking than Discovery first was when it came onto the scene, and we're not seeing hyper fragmentation, I don't think. The only thing I can see Discovery Fans having with SNW as a concept is there isn't a maguffin of the season to pursue and everyone doesn't cry for 20 minutes out of 45. It's a show thats tried to see if the "old way" of doing Trek might be popular because it's some actual escapism on screen, so far as I am aware on the internet at large, SNW season 1 was so popular the main fear expressed is how the hell you top such a strong first season.

Paramount likely has some bean counter somewhere who determines when shows do or don't break even. The only thing we do know is Paramount seem to be doing a better job than Netflix at trying to retain customers.

SNW does make for a good juxtaposition to what a likely The-Next-Next-Generation would be. Is the future of the franchise really (Soft) reboots or moving forward? But, as a legacy Star Trek fan, SNW does "scare me" the most.

One could argue that it's a "prequel series with updated visuals because it's not 1966 any more" rather than a "soft reboot". Certain visuals and things are going to look like absolute garbage to an audience in the 2020s, the 1960s controls being the first, and the miniskirt uniforms being the second.
 
Just to reinforce my last point (Damn you no edit button!)

The Defiant looks outright silly in 2005's In a Mirror, Darkly when compared to the controls the X01 is rocking. It's going to look even sillier nearly 20 years later. You can't just resume push buttons in an era of touch screens and gesture controls.
 
L&O is NBC. ;)

Although it was originally a CBS show. The pilot episode ("Everybody's Favorite Bagman") and a few episodes were actually filmed for a season which was to air on CBS from 1989-90. This never happened, and NBC ended up getting the show. So those episodes were held back and aired on NBC in the actual first season (1990-91).

You can tell which first season episodes were CBS because they don't have the Doink Doink sound (and the onscreen text is a different font).
Confession Time: I've never seen a single episode of Law & Order or CSI. I have seen some of the early seasons of NCIS but that's only because my father watches that show and I hadn't moved out yet. So I saw some of NCIS due to being in the same house.

Just to reinforce my last point (Damn you no edit button!)

The Defiant looks outright silly in 2005's In a Mirror, Darkly when compared to the controls the X01 is rocking. It's going to look even sillier nearly 20 years later. You can't just resume push buttons in an era of touch screens and gesture controls.
I used to be a moderator on TrekBBS during the early years of the board. And one of my co-mods, who'd seen "In a Mirror Darkly", told me that he thought the Defiant looked outdated and out-of-place next to the NX-01, then followed with a "Sorry!" because he knew I'm a big TOS Fan and he didn't want to offend me. I told him I wasn't offended. As much as I love the show, the production values of TOS didn't age as well as TNG's. And it's fair to say that now because TNG today is just as old as TOS was when ENT was on.

Given that this is supposedly TNG's last outing, I'm laying odds that Worf is going to be the one getting the axe (it would be just like him to want to die with honor as a warrior).
That type of death would make sense.
 
Back
Top