So, in Measure of a Man, we have this hearing to decide whether Data is Starfleet property or not.
The JAG officer being notably short on personnel 'recruits' the two most senior officers of the Enterprise as prosecutor and defender. The catch of course being that they personally are both firmly in the 'defender' camp, so that Riker gets to face a difficult dilemma, since the only way he can give his friend Data a fighting chance is by prosecuting him and doing his best to get the opposite result.
Sounds a bit contrived to me (though I appreciate the situation Riker has been put in). So I was wondering if there were real-world legal situations that even remotely resemble the bind Riker's in. Are there (judicial) situations where the rules demand that someone represents his opponent's party, or, if not, what would have been a more realistic depiction of Starfleet resolving this issue?
The JAG officer being notably short on personnel 'recruits' the two most senior officers of the Enterprise as prosecutor and defender. The catch of course being that they personally are both firmly in the 'defender' camp, so that Riker gets to face a difficult dilemma, since the only way he can give his friend Data a fighting chance is by prosecuting him and doing his best to get the opposite result.
Sounds a bit contrived to me (though I appreciate the situation Riker has been put in). So I was wondering if there were real-world legal situations that even remotely resemble the bind Riker's in. Are there (judicial) situations where the rules demand that someone represents his opponent's party, or, if not, what would have been a more realistic depiction of Starfleet resolving this issue?