Don't forget ME1 is also available for PC.Microsoft put out a press release saying that ME1 is an exclusively 360 experience. "If you want to the full Mass Effect experience (minus the apparently bad iPhone game) you'll only find that on the Xbox 360" or some such.
The problem is that over a hundred decisions carry over to ME2, and if you don't have an ME1 save then those decisions are all made for you: Wrex is dead, the Rachni Queen is dead, and so on. Most importantly, it was strongly hinted in ME2 that the decision to save the Rachni Queen would be helpful in ME3, but if PS3 owners don't even have that option, there's less incentive for Bioware to make a big deal out of that in ME3, which is disappointing.Well ME2 already comes with a character creation function for those who can't/dont want to import a ME1 save, does it not? I don't see it being much of a hindrance. It'd be nice of them to include that "Story So Far" video as an extra for those that've never played the first one, but it's by no means a vital inclusion.
I don't expect the Rachni thing to be a huge deal in ME3's story, but I was hoping that it could have an impact upon the ending. Something like this:
Shepard is willing to sacrifice himself at the end of ME3 to stop the Reapers once and for all, but if you spent the first two games making the right decisions, Shepard survives. The right decisions would be saving the Rachni, saving the Council, stopping the Geth/Quarian war, and allowing Cerberus to investigate the Collector base. If you have three of those things, the odds swing in your favour and Shepard survives, but if you only have two or less, Shepard dies. I think something like that would be a great way to have all three games tie-in with one another, it would be awesome if my decision to let the Council die in ME1 (because I was pissed at them over the death of Kaidan) is what causes my Shepard to die in a game released 4 years later. It would be a great incentive for people to replay the trilogy in order to the combination right.
ME2 already told us it was the "right" decision because the Rachni Queen sent an envoy informing us that she was building an army to assist against the Reapers. We also know that saving the Council was probably the "right" decision as all the aliens distrust humans if you let the Council die. We also know that saving Wrex was probably the "right" decision because he went back to Tuchanka to bring peace between the clans. And it's not a simple case of morality either, because saving the Collector base was the right strategic choice while being the wrong moral choice.While I agree with your assessment of the Rachni queen dilemma - I saved her every time -, it would feel wrong to me if there was a "right" decision.
Which is particularly annoying because ME2's canonical version was mostly renegade decisions. It must be jarring to play that game as a paragon and keep being told that you were a complete bastard in the first game.That's really the point. There is no "origin/lore" creation in ME2, so you're stuck with the choices they presume to be canon.
I'd be upset if none of the team members could work with Shepard in ME3, but I'd understand it. But the Rachni Queen being dropped would be a huge let-down, if they're not going to include her in ME3 then they shouldn't have foreshadowed it in ME2. So I'm still holding out hope, and perhaps the PS3 version of ME2 wont force a canonical story on players, but will allow them to choose what happened in the most important events.You have some random character show up and tell you that the queen is important, but I get the sinking feeling that nothing of consequence will happen. Heck, at this point I don't think they'll let you choose between the 15 (or however many there are) possible party members that you've amassed throughout ME1/2.
I very seriously doubt it. A save file is just a save file after all.I have a question I got Mass Effect for the PC recently and it would configure to my computer so I used the EA suggestion to bypass that will this affect my ability to import my Mass Effect 1 Shepard in any way?
While I agree with your assessment of the Rachni queen dilemma - I saved her every time -, it would feel wrong to me if there was a "right" decision.
I feel you lack the necessary knowledge about the nature of the Rachni, their history, the queen herself, etc. to make an informed decision. Of course, the game forces you to make a black or white choice for dramatic reasons, but I sorely missed the sensible third option (postpone the decision, keep the queen in custody).
My mostly paragon femshep let her loose too. My dog of a renegade maleshep on the other hand toasted that bug but good.
Oh and from the record, my femshep also blew up the collector's base. The Illusive Man's track record in not letting his little science projects (my femshep included) escape his control isn't very good and I'll be damned if I'll trust him or the types he hires around Reaper tech.
Between the Quarrian fleet, Legion's Geth, the Rachni and an intact council I think the odds for survival against the Reaper hordes are (ever-so slightly) better than they would be with a berzerk Cerberus Reaper in our midst.
Anyone else wondering if the Keepers will play a greater roll? It is after all, thanks to them that the Reapers are having to walk it all the way from the galactic void.
Plus, I wouldn't trust the Council to make the right choice about what to do with the Queen, especially since I did the Noveria mission directly after Virmire, so I was still pissed at them. The stupid bastards probably wouldn't even recognise the Rachni Queen if it was sitting right in front of them.I chose the right option to let her go. As an individual she did nothing wrong. But the third option of custody would make sense. But would that be fair? I'm not sure it would. Actually I'm pretty sure it wouldn't. Her captivity would have meant more experiments.
I saved the Rachni Queen, allowed the Council to die, reprogrammed the Geth, didn't advise the Quarians either way (so they're probably going to war with the Geth), and handed the base over to Cerberus. I think the odds of my main Shep's survival is on a knife-edge.Between the Quarrian fleet, Legion's Geth, the Rachni and an intact council I think the odds for survival against the Reaper hordes are (ever-so slightly) better than they would be with a berzerk Cerberus Reaper in our midst.
The funny thing is the Council will bitch at you no matter what your choice was (especially the Turian councilor).Plus, I wouldn't trust the Council to make the right choice about what to do with the Queen, especially since I did the Noveria mission directly after Virmire, so I was still pissed at them. The stupid bastards probably wouldn't even recognise the Rachni Queen if it was sitting right in front of them.I chose the right option to let her go. As an individual she did nothing wrong. But the third option of custody would make sense. But would that be fair? I'm not sure it would. Actually I'm pretty sure it wouldn't. Her captivity would have meant more experiments.
Ah yes, "Rachni". The ancient race of warrior insects allegedly brought back from extinction. We have dismissed that claim.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.