Cheadle helped Secret Invasion. Really, he was one of the best things in the last couple of episodes.
But if the stories that came out about his history after the first accusations, there's a pretty decent chance he could get himself in trouble again. Even if the case is thrown out, Marvel would probably still be better off distancing themselves from him. They have almost no choice but to recast and keep going with the character, if they got rid of Kang they'd have to completely change their plans for the overall arc of the next 2 phases and I just can't see them doing that.
However, if this does indeed blow over (unfortunately it might), Marvel will most likely save themselves the trouble and hassle of a recast and just let it die down.
if they got rid of Kang they'd have to completely change their plans for the overall arc of the next 2 phases and I just can't see them doing that.
Well you raise an interesting side point - what if you put together a multi-film narrative but the public isn't buying what you are selling?
I don't know when Kang's next film appearance is but what if that is a dud as well?
Now that does not mean you change everything but do you hold course or deemphasize the importance?
Honestly, he's only been in two properties and I feel like he's overused. The problem with Kang is that he's a major Avengers villain but he's not that interesting of a character, particularly as Marvel has been treating him. The Kang of the comics is fundamentally goofy and is a critique of a lot of colonialist tropes. He's a guy from a Utopian future who got bored of it and wants to go slumming with us "primitives." He's a very good Star Trek villain in some respects as he'd be the guy who goes to a world and takes over with his superior technology so he can pretend to be a Pharaoh or whatever.
He's fundamentally a petty dick.
The one in the MCU is obsessed with stopping himself and is either far more powerful than Eternity (destroying universes left and right) or a guy Ant Man can beat in a fist fight.
He's not even as compelling as crazy environmentalist Thanos.
Thanos was a poorly constructed character who is often defended with the "mad" excuse. Then, there's the nature of the Infinity Stones and how it can reverse death, yet has other limitations never considered by anyone using them. Oh, well. In the end, the Thanos "saga" was pointless spectacle even more senseless than Starlin's original version (i.e., a poor Darkseid knock-off).
The Sokovia Accords. SMH. Anyone in that Avengers conference room could have ended the conversation by reminding Ross that he was in no position to chair or enforce restrictions on enhanced beings after his direct participation in the Abomination affair, which caused a number of civilian deaths (there's no doubt Banner informed the Avengers about that). Hell, Rogers was still trusted enough (at that point) to have to world's ear, where he could have addressed the accords and expose Ross (possibly calling Ross's and his government's participation into question), but the plot (if you can call it that) needed an artificial handcuff on the MCU's own continuity in order to slap together the first stage of the Rogers / Stark conflict.
But hey, Spidey-Lad made his MCU debut (also for no logical in-universe reason), so it was all good.
It was totally ridiculous ( and I say that as a fan of Civil War ).
"New York. Washington."
Oh, you mean where we stopped an alien invasion and then stopped Hydra from killing hundreds of thousands of people?
Isn't that pretty much what happened with the DCEU? They were pretty quick to dump the whole arc Snyder had been working on the moment BvS wasn't as successful as they hoped and he backed out of JL.Well you raise an interesting side point - what if you put together a multi-film narrative but the public isn't buying what you are selling?
I don't know when Kang's next film appearance is but what if that is a dud as well?
Now that does not mean you change everything but do you hold course or deemphasize the importance?
Content gap. Don't know why.He "backed out of" JL... right!
In other news ABC is showing Ms.Marvel right now, for whatever reason.
Thanos was a poorly constructed character who is often defended with the "mad" excuse. Then, there's the nature of the Infinity Stones and how it can reverse death, yet has other limitations never considered by anyone using them. Oh, well. In the end, the Thanos "saga" was pointless spectacle even more senseless than Starlin's original version (i.e., a poor Darkseid knock-off).
The Sokovia Accords. SMH. Anyone in that Avengers conference room could have ended the conversation by reminding Ross that he was in no position to chair or enforce restrictions on enhanced beings after his direct participation in the Abomination affair, which caused a number of civilian deaths (there's no doubt Banner informed the Avengers about that). Hell, Rogers was still trusted enough (at that point) to have to world's ear, where he could have addressed the accords and expose Ross (possibly calling Ross's and his government's participation into question), but the plot (if you can call it that) needed an artificial handcuff on the MCU's own continuity in order to slap together the first stage of the Rogers / Stark conflict.
But hey, Spidey-Lad made his MCU debut (also for no logical in-universe reason), so it was all good.
Isn't that pretty much what happened with the DCEU? They were pretty quick to dump the whole arc Snyder had been working on the moment BvS wasn't as successful as they hoped and he backed out of JL.
I doubt the MCU creative team would be as quick to just dump a storyline, they'd probably just try and tweak and adjust things based on what people's reactions were.
But if the stories that came out about his history after the first accusations, there's a pretty decent chance he could get himself in trouble again. Even if the case is thrown out, Marvel would probably still be better off distancing themselves from him. They have almost no choice but to recast and keep going with the character, if they got rid of Kang they'd have to completely change their plans for the overall arc of the next 2 phases and I just can't see them doing that.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.