Is Marvel "predicting" that enemy or creating it?
Well, obviously by making movies and series whose protagonists are women or women who are non-white they are creating the enemy.



Is Marvel "predicting" that enemy or creating it?
Don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blowsIs Marvel "predicting" that enemy or creating it?
They are very accommodating that way.The one thing I’ve noticed is that the general audience and/or fans always seems ready to support everyone’s personal take on the subject.![]()
The fact is that what we are watching are stories, not documentaries, .
I was going to make the same joke.They would be historical documents to Thermians.
Exactly--I mentioned King's The Dark Tower series earlier, which in my opinion, is one of the best genre examples of a work that employs "literary" fiction devices. Like Misery was a commentary on King's feelings about his own success as a writer, The Dark Tower series was commentary on how a writer creates fictional worlds and characters. The characters knew they were created by King, yet that didn't detract from the surface adventure/fantasy story--and the coda was brilliant in that it implies the stories go on as long as there are new readers to experience them.
When Deadpool arrived it got too silly for me and I stopped reading comics.
Excellent observation; someone might offer insanity as an excuse for Deadpool, but that's certainly not the case with She-Hulk. So, either they are both insane, or the once-"real" world those stories took place in is simply an observed, "hosted" series of stories a couple of characters are sharing with the audience.
Just because you accept something as silly as characters breaking the 4th wall in a film universe that was originally not set up to go in that direction does not mean anyone else has to.
I thought it was silly and would rather watch Adam West as Batman. Which at this point is looking rather serious compared to Thor and Sh...
It is a dramedy--and succeeded in many ways where Powerless failed. It predicted the shows own "real world" enemy and addressed the toxic masculinity that arose around the show throughout the series. If the show had been a longer, "real" show we would have seen much more development of the supporting cast. It was a show about the female viewpoint that resonated with a lot of people in ways that more serious dramas have not.
Where I did say otherwise?
Just because you're unable to accept it doesn't mean everyone else is the same.
I said:
Just because you accept something as silly as characters breaking the 4th wall in a film universe that was originally not set up to go in that direction does not mean anyone else has to.
As a response to your generalizing:
And? My reply to you is as valid as yours, but you seem to have some great difficulty accepting with the fact that there are viewers who have a rational basis for rejecting the silly 4th wall breaking and its effect of the perception of the way the universe had been established. No one is obligated to accept that.
Its called choice for a reason, guy.
Except my response was specifically to you ridiculously overgeneralizing by claiming that breaking the 4th wall "cannot be ignored". It can be. You just don't. No one said you have to or even that you should. Just that it can be and your refusal to admit otherwise isn't rational.
That's the point: some fantasy cannot pull off the commentary within the fantasy framework as well as regular TV dramas, which addressed subjects of this kind with far greater investment in the overall series tapestry, attention to real concerns / impact with characters, particularly in 21st century TV in the genres mentioned in my earlier post. The one, recent exception to this analysis is The Falcon and the Winter Soldier--as Spellman is a far superior writer who chose the topics of racialized experimentation, government abuse, false imprisonment, eugenics, questions about which race is "more American" / can represent the stars and stripes, and seamlessly integrated it in what must be called a Marvel sub-genre (Captain America stories), which at its best, always took on stories about the "American Identity", race and government's involvement in it.
Instead of those grim subjects seeming like its trying to make a point, it made the most effective sociopolitical statement of any MCU production to date. Nothing else in the franchise comes close, and it served as an example of how a present day fantasy production can sell its comic book side, while merging with real world matters in a powerful way not seen since a production from the "other side of the street" handled that in the form of Black Lightning--two series that addressed major issues the average TV drama does not touch (and I'm not strictly talking about "general" interpersonal racial matters).
The fact is, feeling like your destiny is at the whim of powerful and capricious forces beyond your control is incredibly relatable for most people. In a way, characters are never more relatable than when they have to grapple with that.
Why not just stick to the comics that don't star Deadpool? Like, if someone hates gritty noir, then they avoid Daredevil and can stick to stuff like Fantastic Four and Silver Surfer or whatever. Its grittiness doesn't somehow... contaminate those other books. They wouldn't wish Daredevil was cancelled so they could enjoy their more fantastical fare in peace. If you don't like silliness, just don't read the silly books.
It doesn't mean anything for the entire world because it's only happening in her own series.
I managed to avoid him. I don't think I own a single issue of Deadpool and I was reading a lot of comics.I could have stuck with comics that didn't have Deadpool. But he was everywhere at the time.
Is there? They seem to be pacing releases out. Not a whole lot of crossover. The last few movies were Doctor Strange MoM, Thor L&T and Black Panther WF. The last TV shows were Moon Knight, Ms Marvel and She-Hulk AaL. I think they did a good job of getting the audience up to speed without requiring them to watch previous films.t feels to me anyways ..that the films are going the way of the books. Too much product hitting at once and in some cases you need to watch a certain film or series to get the full story.
I could have stuck with comics that didn't have Deadpool. But he was everywhere at the time. I just think Marvel started to lose their way back in the mid to late 90's and pretty much gave up. DC as well. I think Marvel at one point had over 80 titles. Most in the marvel universe. They did so many crossovers to get you to buy more books it was ridiculous. They really haven't learned their lesson yet.
The last Arcs I really got into with Marvel was the Clone saga in the spiderman books and Age of Apocalypse.
I will admit it's easier to ignore the silly stuff with the books since they are continually retconning. But with the films I have a tougher time of ignoring it.
It feels to me anyways ..that the films are going the way of the books. Too much product hitting at once and in some cases you need to watch a certain film or series to get the full story.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.