• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Main Title Sequence

I said before somewhere that this intro doesn't have a single star in it. But it probably does if you look really close

GSg8KjJ.jpg

Now I wanna see the whole opening in negative....

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Hey, I already did the inverted thing a couple of weeks ago here. :D
 
You know what might be cool? Using the inverted graphics if/when they have a Mirror Universe episode. I always liked how they changed the titles on Fringe to reflect that.
 
You know what might be cool? Using the inverted graphics if/when they have a Mirror Universe episode. I always liked how they changed the titles on Fringe to reflect that.
Yeah, that was cool. Also when they changed the opening titles for ENT's "In A Mirror, Darkly" two-parter.
 
If this has already been pointed out, then my apologies. Isn't the opening sequence showing little bits and pieces of each episode in S1? The flower is the gormagander. The hand is (probably) Lethe (might be an episode earlier than this), when MB dreams of herself being thrust into the place of Ripper. ...
 
I went back and watched this again, and yeah, I'm still just as baffled by it. What the heck is going on in this opening sequence? The first part of it is "hey, check out some concept art and the CGI wireframes for our spacewalk SFX," along with a really-out-of-place closeup of someone's dry skin. Other elements that follow include an eyeball, a miniature version of the spaceship being bitten at by a cartoon dragon or something, what looks like a blast of sperm flying out of a vortex, the Vulcan peace sign, and...ugh. I can't keep going. It's like a really-ineptly-executed, LSD-infused ripoff of the Game of Thrones intros.

I feel like this title sequence is basically representative of their entire creative process - a highly-derivative, free-thought project wrapped around modern politics and grimdark philosophy.

I don't understand what's not to get. It's a title sequence displaying Trek iconography. It's no more thoughtful or thoughtless than seeing Voyager just roaming around space.
 
I don't understand what's not to get. It's a title sequence displaying Trek iconography. It's no more thoughtful or thoughtless than seeing Voyager just roaming around space.
I guess selective memory is at play if they've forgotten the TOS credits; whoosh, whoosh, fly to a planet, orbit, whoosh, whoosh, whoosh, whoosh. Thought-provoking stuff, all that whooshing.
 
I guess selective memory is at play if they've forgotten the TOS credits; whoosh, whoosh, fly to a planet, orbit, whoosh, whoosh, whoosh, whoosh. Thought-provoking stuff, all that whooshing.
And TNG's was basically a remake of TOS's.

I didn't browse forums in 2001, but was there a backlash over how ENT's credits took a different direction ASIDE from the song? Like, fans upset that it wasn't just a montage of the Enterprise NX-01 doing flybys?
 
And TNG's was basically a remake of TOS's.

I didn't browse forums in 2001, but was there a backlash over how ENT's credits took a different direction ASIDE from the song? Like, fans upset that it wasn't just a montage of the Enterprise NX-01 doing flybys?
There were a few alternates created from ship flybys combined with Archer's Theme, including an official one made before season 4 that included Archer doing the narration (except phrasing it "where no human has gone before"), but IIRC, people were mostly positive on the montage and saved their ire for the song.

Wait! No, there was a controversy over all of the clips being of Americans. Oh, yeah, that was the shit. Including people with better reception figuring out the scientist at the chalkboard couldn't be Russian because he was writing in English.
 
In the opening credits of Disco, are those TOS props? The phaser is diagrammed, exploded, and when it spins around it's the Disco phaser. But before that is it a straight up TOS phaser? And before the communicator becomes a sound wave, that's not the Disco prop, is it?

I wish the rest of Discovery (and JJ) took the design sensibility that those two props take. They are wonderful updates of the TOS props. Very close yet very modern.
 
You've got it. The TOS phaser transitions to the DSC phaser, but the TOS communicator just dissolves away.

The Tricorder is also a pretty great modernization. The communicator is probably my least favorite of the three, but that's probably because it take cues from my least favorite communicator, the TWOK brick. It's a shame DSC wasn't made fifteen years ago when transparent electronics were in style, we could've had a faithfully updated "Cage" communicator. ;)
 
For those who sort of like the current one, but not enough.....
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
This is starting to sound a bit... familiar...
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top