Well, I watched the second episode, and aside from having Amy Acker, it wasn't an improvement on the pilot. Well, maybe a slight improvement in that they caught the bad guy instead of killing him, although there were a lot of henchmen shot down. It's still too much of a generic spy show, and MacGyver's improvisations seem to have less of a point to them when he's got all this heavily armed backup. Granted, the homemade night-vision goggles were an impressive build, though I'm not sure they'd really work as shown. His other improvs seemed kind of implausible too. And overall, MacGyver has relatively little screen time for the guy the show is named after.
I also wish Amy Acker had had a richer part to work with, but anything would be a letdown after her role -- well, roles -- on Person of Interest.
I like Amy Acker but is she cast as a good guy or bad guy because she tends to do a lot of roles as the bad guy.
She's a good guy here.
My mom is an avid viewer of all the CBS procedurals, so I asked what she thought of MacGyver. Her response was "It's okay, if there's nothing else on and your book fell in the toilet."![]()
That is a nice change. Often I have seen her cast as the baddie. I guess she likes those roles more.
Well, Root on Person of Interest started out as a "baddie" but evolved into something far more complex and essentially heroic. And of course her breakout role was as sweet, innocent Fred on Angel, before changing into the demon Illyria, who was basically evil-ish but ended up on the good guys' side. Her role in Dollhouse was similarly ambiguous (everyone on that show was morally ambiguous), but she was pretty sympathetic there. And she was the voice of the Huntress on Justice League Unlimited, a heroine with a darker streak. And she's played kindly characters like Audrey on Agents of SHIELD, Myka's sister Tracy on Warehouse 13, and Nova on Scooby-Doo: Mystery Incorporated. Even the villainous Wesen she played on Grimm was ambiguous. The one pure villain role I've seen her in was Kelly in Alias's final season.
So your experience with Acker's career must be very different from mine. I'd say she usually plays either morally ambiguous but sympathetic characters or straight-up sweethearts.
CBS already has an over-the-top think tank type team based show with Macgyverisms in it, called Scorpion.
I have no idea where they are going with this but I hope they figure it out.
And worst of all they rush through the actual science so fast that it almost feels like an afterthought. I realize it was always a bit ridiculous on the original show how much time MacGyver had and how many convenient ingredients he had around to craft his devices, but at least we got to see more of the actual process and how much care he had to take to get things right. And those were always the most fun and interesting parts of the episode. But here it comes across as nothing but a cute little party trick he does, and flies by so fast you can barely even follow it.
It's sad to say, to me Scorpion is a way better show than MacGyver.CBS already has an over-the-top think tank type team based show with Macgyverisms in it, called Scorpion.
I have no idea where they are going with this but I hope they figure it out.
Old Mac's whole thing was improvising because he was (usually) alone in the field, or working personal missions and things just sorta came up. In this instance, he just comes across as an either unprepared or super-arrogant generic spy. He's got armed backup and a techie in a surveillance van out front, so why isn't he going in better prepared?
Improvising should be more forced by the circumstances and less just about preference/challenge of doing so under pressure.
I think Elementary just has Holmes,Watson and Lestrade.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.