• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Lost In Space Series Reboot In Works

Unnecessary.

One day, someone will understand that LiS is so much a creature of its time, that it cannot be grafted on the body of modern sensibilities for a modern audience not caring about a family adventure in space. Unlike adapting old novels, where there's no strong or culturally fixed visual association (so there's interpretive flexibility) LiS is all about the TV series' visual & character identity--from the robot, Smith, to the Jupiter 2, hard-shaped by a 60s view of the future.

Expect this to be another disaster.

Well I'm sure the exact same argument could have been made about BSG, but they somehow managed to make that remake feel not only relevant but much more interesting and intelligent than the original.

Obviously a lot of LIS's identity right now is about the hammy acting, cheesy aliens, and 60s design, but a really good writer could take that same premise and do something a LOT cooler and more interesting with it I bet.
 
Well, the original idea behind Lost in Space was to do a survival drama, and we've seen successful instances of that genre in modern times, including a certain J.J. Abrams/Damon Lindelof show.

Put another way, perhaps the way to do a modern Lost in Space is to do Lost... in space. ;)
 
I enjoyed the movie quite a bit.

Gary Oldman. Lacey Chaubert. Even That Guy Who Played Joey.

"And...the monkey flips the switch."

As did I. Didn't you also like Green Lantern? Guess that makes us a demographic of 2. :lol:

Make that three. The 1998 film was one reboot I actually liked. Still, not as good as the original, but I liked it.

I might have liked the 1998 film better if and only if the production design was a recognizable revision of the Jupiter 2(flying saucer) as the 1701 was from TOS/TAS to TMP. :sigh:
 
Yeah, as I noted up thread, we got fooled by a kind of "bait and switch". We see something with the overall silhouette of the classic J2 on the launch gantry. we even see it rocket into orbit. But once there, they, in effect, blow it up to reveal the "real" ship.

Sincerely,

Bill
 
Yeah, as I noted up thread, we got fooled by a kind of "bait and switch". We see something with the overall silhouette of the classic J2 on the launch gantry. we even see it rocket into orbit. But once there, they, in effect, blow it up to reveal the "real" ship.

Sincerely,

Bill

Which people should have expected since they kept referring to it as the Jupiter 1 while the ship from the show was the Jupiter 2.
 
Yeah, as I noted up thread, we got fooled by a kind of "bait and switch". We see something with the overall silhouette of the classic J2 on the launch gantry. we even see it rocket into orbit. But once there, they, in effect, blow it up to reveal the "real" ship.

Sincerely,

Bill

Agree. The revealed Jupiter 2 exterior hull looked terrible :barf: IMHO.
 
With the world in the shape it is in presently - whole families, hell, entire populations! - on the run and with no hope of really "getting back"; with economies struggling to support any semblance of functionality; with time-tested roles of countries and currencies suddenly changing places and prominences, I think a movie chronicling a family found, then lost, then found again through trial and struggle and strength (and death) would be

Just.
About.
Right.

right now...

but, do NOT fuck with the design of the Robot or the Jupiter 2
 
Anyone know what the Jupiter 2 from the previous aborted pilot looked like? Supposedly it was in the far background of some of the rag-tag-fleet shots of the newer BSG.
 
Interstellar actually made me think of the original LiS pilot. There is certainly a way to do this tastefully and in a modern way.
 
Anyone know what the Jupiter 2 from the previous aborted pilot looked like? Supposedly it was in the far background of some of the rag-tag-fleet shots of the newer BSG.

I'm not sure, since I only saw the John Woo pilot once some years ago, but I think its conceit was that the J2 was one of a whole bunch of landing craft attached to a much larger colony ship, and that it was the only one that jettisoned intact when the colony ship was destroyed by aliens.
 
I enjoyed the movie quite a bit.

Gary Oldman. Lacey Chaubert. Even That Guy Who Played Joey.

"And...the monkey flips the switch."

As did I. Didn't you also like Green Lantern? Guess that makes us a demographic of 2. :lol:

I liked Roger Corman's Fantastic Four, too. I think that makes me a demographic of Having More Fun Than A Lot Of Folks. :lol:

I actually think Corman's F4 movie is decent, as well.
 
I enjoyed the movie quite a bit.

Gary Oldman. Lacey Chaubert. Even That Guy Who Played Joey.

"And...the monkey flips the switch."

As did I. Didn't you also like Green Lantern? Guess that makes us a demographic of 2. :lol:
3 (And I also enjoyed John Carter of Mars)

Our population is rising. I could quibble about stuff, but I rewatch all of these movies from time-to-time.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top