This TARDIS team could definitely use some thinning out. Why Chibnall decided on 3 companions, I will never know! Of the 1st 5 episodes this season, "Spyfall, Part 1" was the only one to even remotely use all of the companions well. "Spyfall, Part 2" & "Fugitive of the Judoon" seemed to focus almost exclusively on the Doctor while the companions all got shoved into an irrelevant B-plot that only served to keep them out of the way. Meanwhile, "Orphan 55" & "Nikola Tesla's Night of Terror" are so chock-full of guest characters that the companions can't get a word in edgewise. Ryan had a few good moments in "Orphan 55" but that's it.
I don't really care which of the 3 they get rid of, although Ryan has been my least favorite so far.
Ahem, what you're forgetting is that HIS BEST FRIEND HAS A TIME MACHINE!!!!!
I'm not sure that Capaldi's problem was so much bad writing as it was the fact that his early episodes were working too hard to make his Doctor a little too harsh, so you can see Capaldi's performance straining against that. In later episodes, once he & the writers were on the same page & more comfortable with each other, his stuff worked like gangbusters!
I would agree that Capaldi is better than Whittaker. Not that I don't like Whittaker. She's honestly the only thing holding this show together for me at the moment. But Capaldi is my #1 favorite, while I would rank Whittaker as more lower-middle tier (just below Tennant and maybe slightly above C. Baker).
I was always very fond of the Michelle Gomez Master. "Boys, blow up this plane. And then, I don't know... Belgium, yeah? Kill some Belgians. Might as well, they're not even French."
I have a much more mixed opinion about John Simm. During his early appearances, I found him to have gone beyond campy and into the realm of cartoonish. But I thought he was absolutely wonderful in "World Enough & Time"/"The Doctor Falls."
I don't really care which of the 3 they get rid of, although Ryan has been my least favorite so far.
I agree, given Walsh does The Chase, that show where he goes across America with his son, the Christmas thing he did with Holly Willoughby, did he have an album out as well....I wonder when he sleeps! (then again I look at Tennant, Olivia Colman, Toni Collette and others and wonder when they find time to film everything they're in)
Ahem, what you're forgetting is that HIS BEST FRIEND HAS A TIME MACHINE!!!!!

A lot has been said about Capaldi having bad writing, but I don't agree that it was anywhere near as bad, plus TBH, Capaldi is a better actor than Jodie has demonstrated so far. I do buy her as the Doctor, but writing can't be the only culprit for why I'm so underwhelmed.
I'm not sure that Capaldi's problem was so much bad writing as it was the fact that his early episodes were working too hard to make his Doctor a little too harsh, so you can see Capaldi's performance straining against that. In later episodes, once he & the writers were on the same page & more comfortable with each other, his stuff worked like gangbusters!
I would agree that Capaldi is better than Whittaker. Not that I don't like Whittaker. She's honestly the only thing holding this show together for me at the moment. But Capaldi is my #1 favorite, while I would rank Whittaker as more lower-middle tier (just below Tennant and maybe slightly above C. Baker).
Finally I also remember people not be that impressed with the portrayal of the Master at the time the episodes aired.
I was always very fond of the Michelle Gomez Master. "Boys, blow up this plane. And then, I don't know... Belgium, yeah? Kill some Belgians. Might as well, they're not even French."

I have a much more mixed opinion about John Simm. During his early appearances, I found him to have gone beyond campy and into the realm of cartoonish. But I thought he was absolutely wonderful in "World Enough & Time"/"The Doctor Falls."