^Why does everyone assume there is Federation territory on the far side of the Klingon Empire? I've never understood that. Are we supposed to infer that there is a "bridge" over Klingon space that can't be represented in this 2-D map?
^Why does everyone assume there is Federation territory on the far side of the Klingon Empire? I've never understood that. Are we supposed to infer that there is a "bridge" over Klingon space that can't be represented in this 2-D map?
^Why does everyone assume there is Federation territory on the far side of the Klingon Empire? I've never understood that. Are we supposed to infer that there is a "bridge" over Klingon space that can't be represented in this 2-D map?
^Why does everyone assume there is Federation territory on the far side of the Klingon Empire? I've never understood that. Are we supposed to infer that there is a "bridge" over Klingon space that can't be represented in this 2-D map?
Looking at the Known Space inset map in Star Charts' rear foldouts, I'd say it's because of the various references to Canopus in TOS, implying that it was in or near Federation space. So he put in a peninsula of UFP space that extended to Canopus, and it ended up beyond Klingon space. Mandel had to reconcile the star names mentioned in TOS with our modern estimates of their positions, and so there are some stars that end up much farther away than most of UFP territory and in weird directions.
Anyway, there's no guarantee that the bulk of the Federation and the Klingon Empire are in the same plane anyway. One could well be mostly "below" the other in three dimensions. That should be understood as a rule rather than an exception.
I'd say it's because of the various references to Canopus in TOS, implying that it was in or near Federation space.
Like publiusr, I’ve always had a soft spot for the FASA maps, and the “Star Trek Maps” they were an adaptation of. Unfortunately, trying to get them to mesh with all the later information revealed in “Star Trek” is very difficult. Also, due to some unfortunate problems with the way the star coordinates were calculated, getting the stars to match up with what we know about real outer space is impossible (it really is, because I’ve not only tried and failed, but actually learned enough about Cartesian coordinates while doing it to know the “Star Trek Maps” can’t be corrected without completely distorting them). It doesn’t stop them looking good though, and the “Star Trek Maps” had side-views, too.
...Are the Kinshaya encapsulated inside modern Klingon Empire, or atop/below it?
I haven't read of A Singular Destiny, but supposedly it features the Kinshaya conquering Klingon planets that Picard interacted with - so, a major thrust out of this "captivity" and towards UFP space, or what?
Timo Saloniemi
That said, in extrapolating from Star Charts, I'm not sure my placement of the Kinshaya in that quick sketch-out on the previous page is quite accurate. The charts feature the route of the nexus, which in the novel 'verse enters Kinshaya space in the 2380s, so the Holy Order should probably be further over, more distant from the galactic meridian, in order to fit with that. It's far past time I updated my pen and paper charts - when I can find the time...
This thread is once again making me really wish that Trek included TrekLit in their reference works like Star Wars. Their references books have content from comics, video games and books. I understand there is a lot less on screen material to draw from for SW, so it is a lot easier to draw from that kind of stuff for their books. But it would still be nice to get some official reference material for the Novelverse, rather than just the fan sites and wikis.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.