• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Let’s talk about the destruction of Trek utopia…

War is repeatedly considered normal in the TOS era. They featured racism repeatedly and never at all implied it had died out. The Enterprise visited planets that were obviously poor (and Captain Kirk grew up on a planet that had so many problems their governor executed people to have enough food left over for the others). And money is used *all* the time in that era.
No, war is considered inevitable and to be avoided if possible. The Enterprise repeatedly asks for surrender rather than destroy the enemy, thought the enemy often destroys themselves. And what racism? The only comments on race came in The Squire of Gothos and The Savage Curtain. Other than that humanity was considered a uniform whole. The Enterprise crew, with very few exceptions, treated all other species the same. And the planet Kirk was on (no mention of any other member of his family being there) during the reign of Kodos was a case of a food catastrophe, not poverty. And I can't think of an episode where they actually exchange money for anything. There was never a Federation currancy established. The closest is The Trouble With Tribbles.
 
Massive Curveball. This is wild. But it fits the Romulans' MO, from ENT in the 22nd Century all the way up to PIC at the turn of the 25th.

I think the Romulans are responsible for Earth's Utopia. How do I figure? I'm glad you asked.

In the Mid-21st Century, Earth was recovering from WWIII. Gigantic numbers of casualties. Societies shattered. "Nuclear winters" according to Picard in "A Matter of Time" (TNG). When Vulcan made First Contact with Earth in 2063, they were making First Contact with a planet where its inhabitants almost annihilated each other. Imagine this species joining the Interstellar Community. Imagine how much of a threat a warp-capable Earth with more weaponry would be.

In "Kir'Shara" (ENT), it's revealed that the Vulcan High Command was being run by a Romulan mole in the 22nd Century. Who knows how long there were Romulan moles in critical positions on Vulcan? If Romulans were infiltrating Vulcan even before 2063, then it's possible news of Earth breaking the warp barrier and finding out what the planet was like got back to them.

So the Romulans, who were controlling the Vulcans, made sure the Vulcans would oversee Earth for close to 100 years, to mold the planet into something more docile. Something more manageable. Something more controllable. So they called Humans savages. And Humans then spent the next century trying to prove they weren't. By having something to prove, they made themselves become peaceful, benevolent, and more diplomatic.

Eventually diplomacy fails, eventually Vulcan lost its grip on Earth, and the Earth/Romulan War finally did break out. But it was nowhere near as bad as it could've been if Earth hadn't become more civilized. 21st Century-minded Humans could've been even worse than the Klingons in the Romulans' eyes.

So I think, for its own protection in the future, Romulans pulled strings like a puppet-master to turn Earth into the "Utopia" that it eventually became.
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
That is only because TNG was sterile for 80's/90's prime time audiences while Picard is freer to play in the world and get a little more down and dirty. At its core, Picard carries the same positive message of the future as TNG did. It promised and delivered exactly what was promised.

Really? Isolationist Federation? Fox News stand-in? Synthetic life ban (which could mean very nasty things for the Exocomps and sentient Nanite colony...)? Beloved characters brought back only to be killed horribly (or learn their child died a preventable death because of said Federation stupidity)? I found it more depressing than Discovery.
 
And I can't think of an episode where they actually exchange money for anything. There was never a Federation currancy established.
Kirk said a lot of money was invested in starfleet training. Kirk also intended to pay the miners on Rigel XII for their lithium, though we never see it happen.

https://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies/economy.html


And what racism? The only comments on race came in The Squire of Gothos and The Savage Curtain.
That officer in Balance of Terror was pretty racist against the Romulans, and by extension Spock when the found out they looked the same and were probably related.
 
Kirk said a lot of money was invested in Starfleet training. Kirk also intended to pay the miners on Rigel XII for their lithium, though we never see it happen.

https://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies/economy.html

All of these inconsistencies about money came about because Gene Roddenberry never nailed down what the Federation's economic system was in TOS, and then when he was asked about it on TNG, he was so old, he had no way of actually doing so, as revealed in the book Gene Roddenberry: The Man And The Myth Behind Star Trek, so people had to guess what it was and what we saw on the screen on TNG was the result.


That officer in Balance of Terror was pretty racist against the Romulans, and by extension Spock when the found out they looked the same and were probably related.

Remember how some humans (Jonathan Archer included) were against Vulcans because of the way they kept the knowledge of what races were out there that were harmful to Earth, and also of how they kept back information about warp drive [and were also condescending towards humans?) That's where it came from.
 
The Enterprise repeatedly asks for surrender rather than destroy the enemy
The Klingons, Romulans and Borg (and Cardasians?) also offer the option of surrender to their opponents. So that hardly make the Federation/Starfleet unique.
 
Really? Isolationist Federation? Fox News stand-in? Synthetic life ban (which could mean very nasty things for the Exocomps and sentient Nanite colony...)? Beloved characters brought back only to be killed horribly (or learn their child died a preventable death because of said Federation stupidity)? I found it more depressing than Discovery.
The Synthetic Life Ban was an integral part of the story. It was the driving force underlying everything. And look at how it was resolved. It was again shown to be driven by actions of those outside the Federation. So you may have found it depressing, but I found it a thrilling series full of what I expect Star Trek to be. And what it has been before (I can't think of any of the major plot points that hadn't been used before in TNG or TOS).
 
The Klingons, Romulans and Borg (and Cardasians?) also offer the option of surrender to their opponents. So that hardly make the Federation/Starfleet unique.
Which poses an interesting question about what each would do with said prisoners. We get to see the Enterprise take a Romulan prisoner. Spock escorts her with no additional security. She was likely returned to Romulan space. Arne Darvin was also take prisoner. And years later was free to try to disrupt things and change history. The Federation does not mistreat their prisoners and does not keep them without reason. We got to see a Klingon prison in Star Trek VI. Not very nice. And according to Spock (and Vulcan's generally do not lie, not about things like this) recounts how some others treat their prisoners. So that difference in how they are treated after being taken prisoner is included in asking for surrender.
 
Also, Miles O'Brien was clearly racist towars "Cardies", as he called them.
Yep.

Though the "Cardie" slur wasn't in it, O'Brien's hatred from his war experiences and his soul-searching because of it was a very prominent subplot from TNG "The Wounded," which was the first Cardassian episode.

It didn't get better when O'Brien moved over to DS9. Memory Alpha cites use of "Cardie(s)" only in DS9, buy including various times by O'Brien while exhibiting prejudice (e.g. as in "Tribunal").

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Cardie
 
The Synthetic Life Ban was an integral part of the story. It was the driving force underlying everything. And look at how it was resolved. It was again shown to be driven by actions of those outside the Federation. So you may have found it depressing, but I found it a thrilling series full of what I expect Star Trek to be. And what it has been before (I can't think of any of the major plot points that hadn't been used before in TNG or TOS).

It may have been driven by Romulans, but the citizens of the Federation went with it. Whatever happened to the Exocomps and sentient nanites? If they were wiped out does the Federation get a pass on dual genocides if "The Romulans made them do it"? Why was B4 disassembled? Did Starfleet kill him?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top