A link to the 2005 movie in some wise would explain the ape/reptile hostility
Not gonna happen. That was a Universal film.
A link to the 2005 movie in some wise would explain the ape/reptile hostility
I don’t see this movie straight up killing off either one of them.I’m thinking Kong’s greater upper body strength and tool making will give him the victory. ‘Zilla might wind up with a jaw stretch, same as T-Rex in the original.
A link to the 2005 movie in some wise would explain the ape/reptile hostility
I don’t see this movie straight up killing off either one of them.
Fair assumption.Shun Oguri's character getting name-dropped
Mr. Ren Serizawa
Related to Ken Watanabe's Serizawa?
Cool and disappointing at the same time. As usual in these Vs movies there will be no clear winner to keep everyone happy.It really does look like MechGodzilla is in one or two shots in the trailer, so I'm figuring at the end the real Big G and Kong will team up against MG.
The director has promised there will be a clear winner. My guess is that one will be defeated but not killed and then they both have to team up.Cool and disappointing at the same time. As usual in these Vs movies there will be no clear winner to keep everyone happy.
So I kind of expect Kong to win this and finally be referred to as King Kong.
All that may be true, but it makes narrative sense to me. Godzilla gets a movie called King of the Monsters, while Kong’s two movies just refer to him as Kong. If he wins the fight, then he can be titled King Kong.
Ahem.A movie title is one thing. How the character is addressed in-story is another.
Ahem
And Legendary Kong has never been referred to as King Kong, while past versions have. My point is simply that it makes narrative sense to me that he will win the fight and they will use this as the moment to give him the title. Think of it as an "Avengers assemble" type situation. It's when he finally earns it.Yes, it appeared as a nickname. I acknowledged as much. My point is that the character's actual name is Kong, and there's nothing wrong with addressing him that way.
And Legendary Kong has never been referred to as King Kong, while past versions have.
My point is simply that it makes narrative sense to me that he will win the fight and they will use this as the moment to give him the title. Think of it as an "Avengers assemble" type situation. It's when he finally earns it.
You've never had any problems reaching minimum word counts in writing assignments, have you?I'd be curious to know to what extent they have been. Did the "King" epithet get used in-story in the DeLaurentiis version (including the sequel King Kong Lives) and the Jackson version? And if so, how extensively? Did it only appear in signage? Was it spoken in dialogue, and if so, how many times? Again, the character's actual name is only Kong, in every version except KKvG. The "King" part is just a nickname, and thus not essential. After all, the name "Kong" comes from the language of the Skull Island indigenes, while "King" is an English title appended by Kong's abductors.
It clearly matters more to you than it does to me. It's not a literal title; it doesn't actually mean anything or afford him any status or abilities he didn't already have. It's just a metaphor. I don't need to hear it used in-story any more than I need to hear the Doctor called "Doctor Who" in-story.
You've never had any problems reaching minimum word counts in writing assignments, have you?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.