• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Least favorite Buffy characters

I'd say having Buffy suck your rotted, pale cock and tell you how awesome and heroic you are, when you obviously aren't, is a reward. It's no wonder Sarah Michelle Gellar called her scenes with Spike "degrading" and wants nothing more to do with that idiot Whedon.

This is news to me...link?

I saw it on a Buffy board years ago. I'd be hard pressed to find or remember it now. It was in some small, throw away interview as I recall. But I was able to find this:

Least favorite episode?
I had trouble with the one [in the sixth season] where Buffy had sex with Spike on the balcony while watching their friends. I really thought that was out of character. And I didn't like what it stood for. That was the moment that I had the most problems with.

You've mentioned how much you disliked the sixth season. Why was that? And how did you feel about Buffy's depression, and her sexual obsession with Spike?
It wasn't who Buffy was, or why people loved her. You don't want to see that dark heroine; you don't want to see her punishing herself. You want to see her killing vampires and making quips. It didn't feel like the character that I loved.
http://www.smgboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=4543&hl=

SMG may have had a reputation of being a bit of a diva on set. But if it's one thing I always liked about her was that she was always a huge fan of the characters and the story, so she knows what she's talking about. I remember reading somewhere that one of the reasons she agreed to come back for two more seasons was that Jossy Poo had promised her in the first season Xander and Buffy would end up together, and she wanted to see that through. She felt betrayed by what eventually happened. Which is why she's more or less cut her ties to Mutant Enemy.
 
Last edited:
Dawn -- throughout Seasons 5 & 6 she was just annoying. She didn't really bug me that much in Season 7, but that may have been because she was starting to look noticeably hotter to me, I don't know. ;)

Conner -- same thing. Annoying, treacherous, and selfish. His appearances in Season 5, however, were tolerable -- actually, his showing up to help Angel fight in the finale was actually kind of... cool. Who would've guessed?

Kennedy -- admitting that you are a brat doesn't make your brattiness any more acceptable. God, she irked me. And I didn't buy her relationship with Willow either; Tara took a little while to grow on me, but I eventually came to love her. She and Willow were a great match. With Kennedy, it was more like, "Hey, were both hot lesbians, let's hook up!" Which, in and of itself, isn't a bad thing, naturally (;)), but as I've said, her actual character was too much of a bitch for me to get anything out of their relationship.

Wesley (but only when he was on Buffy) -- yes, he was written to be annoying, pompous, incompetent, and cowardly, so I guess we weren't supposed to like him. When he first showed up on Angel, I was extremely skeptical and apprehensive, but over the course of the series he changed so drastically (yet believably) that he evolved into arguably the coolest character in the Slayerverse.

There are other characters that would occasionally bother me, some more than others (but in spite of them, I still loved both shows), however, I'd say these are the ones at the top of my list.
 
The Potentials
Adam
Connor pre-season 5
Lorne
Gunn
Jasmine
Those motherfucker college students in Beer Bad
That cock college professor who kept calliing Buffy "blonde girl"
The Master
Oz
The First
 
Wesley (but only when he was on Buffy) -- yes, he was written to be annoying, pompous, incompetent, and cowardly, so I guess we weren't supposed to like him. When he first showed up on Angel, I was extremely skeptical and apprehensive, but over the course of the series he changed so drastically (yet believably) that he evolved into arguably the coolest character in the Slayerverse.


I think Wesley has one of the best character arcs on either Buffyverse shows. He probably changes the most, but in a believable and sometimes heart-wrenching way, we get to actually see him become the character he is in Not Fade Away, rather than him just waking up a badass one morning. I think it's wonderfully summed up in the exchange with Gunn:
"What happened to you man?"
"I got my throat cut and all my friends abandoned me."

I'd have given this honour to Willow except the writers chickened out of following her character arc through in season 6 and examining her 'control freak to hide my insecurities' thing that they'd been hinting at since Restless, making it instead a by-the-numbers addiction story. Up to about Tabula Rasa, I was very impressed with her character arc. After that, not so much.
 
"Wild at Heart" is probably my least favorite episode in the entire series, and all because of Veruca. I hated her behavior, her demeanor, the whole manner in which she was presented.
Exactly. Throughout that whole episode I kept thinking 'why couldn't they have written a more likable character?' I mean, she didn't have to be a total sleaze for us to sympathize with Willow! Her whole motivations made absolutely no sense! It may have if they explained that being a werewolf and being out there and free felt good, or was addicting. But it was established on more than one occasion that people can't remember and aren't in control of their actions when in wolf form. So what difference would it make to her if she were sitting in a cage or free to roam about and kill???

It would have been better if the situation were not so black and white, with shades of gray - something Whedon excels at writing. Though, to be fair, he didn't write every single Buffy episode and at the time was producing two shows.
I think it's wonderfully summed up in the exchange with Gunn:
"What happened to you man?"
"I got my throat cut and all my friends abandoned me."
Don't get me wrong, I thought Wesley was awesome, but I was annoyed with how the whole prophecy that led him to stealing Conner was handled. Then we were supposed to feel sympathy for him, even though everything that happened was 100% his own fault!

Gunn should have replied "we abandoned you because you didn't trust us enough to not take things into your own hands! Why should we put faith in you when you could just turn around and betray us based on a few lines from some vague prophecy written centuries ago?"

I'd love to have seen how Wes would reply to that.
She felt betrayed by what eventually happened. Which is why she's more or less cut her ties to Mutant Enemy.
Well, that's just tough. Unless she has the title of writer or producer, she has absolutely no say in what happens on the show. Having buffy and Zander get together would have been disaserous, and I'm at a loss as to why SMG would ever want this to happen.

I'm sure Whedon will do just fine without her involvement - unless he has plans on writing a future Scooby sequel.
 
Last edited:
Well, that's just tough. Unless she has the title of writer or producer, she has absolutely no say in what happens on the show. Having buffy and Zander get together would have been disaserous, and I'm at a loss as to why SMG would ever want this to happen.
Yeah because Buffy and Spike was universally loved. I remeber all the Spuffy hate sites that used to be out there. How many veiwers did they lose after season 6 again? Oh don't get me wrong, it still has it's fans. But they're mostly what David Fury called "a bunch of serial killer groupies".

I really don't care honestly. Either way, it would have been better then that crap finale. But I can think of a few reasons why it would be a good closer. How about having things come full circle? How about it being about the the main 4 again, rather then The Shirtless Wonder? How about Buffy finding someone she could actually settle down and have a family with? How about her not spreading her legs like a $2 dollar whore for the walking corpses she was trained and chosen to kill? Any of those are decent enough reasons I suppose. But I know we can't have goodness, decency, and happiness in this venue. It's nothing but unflinching, snarky, nihilism. That's what veiwers want, right Joss? Fuck this hero nonsense.



I'm sure Whedon will do just fine without her involvement - unless he has plans on writing a future Scooby sequel.
She has several films in the works, and a new show on HBO coming up. Her films have grossed over $628 million dollars. The Greatest and Bestest Movie of All Times That Is Going To Make Star Wars Look like A Wet Fart By Comparison(that would be Serenity) I'm pretty sure didn't even make half of what The Grudge did. I'm not a big SMG fan by any means. I just have far more respect for her integrity then I ever will Joss Whedon or his fans. Because, after all, she's not the one who fired long time loyal trooper Charisma Carpenter for the unforgivable and heinious crime of having sex with her husband so he could bring in the love of his life, James Marsters. That right there is how he earned my ire. Granted, it did lead to her Playboy spread(to quote Borat "Very Nice!"). So maybe my dislike for Whedon is misdirected only for that reason. And she's going to be in The Expendables. So again, "Very Nice!".

But Whedon's doing just fine? Seriously? There was the huge success that was Firefly. Then of course there was the film version that broke box office records. Then he moved on to bigger and better things when he wrote some overhyped and mediocre X-Men comic book that he couldn't ever manage to get done on time. Because his schedule was so full. Then there was Doctor Whogivesacrap's Whateverthehellitwas. And now we have the insanely popular Dollhouse, in which Whedon has managed to do the unthinkable: He made Eliza Dushku look mediocre. If karma were real I'd have sex with it.
 
I really don't care honestly. Either way, it would have been better then that crap finale. But I can think of a few reasons why it would be a good closer. How about having things come full circle? How about it being about the the main 4 again, rather then The Shirtless Wonder? How about Buffy finding someone she could actually settle down and have a family with? How about her not spreading her legs like a $2 dollar whore for the walking corpses she was trained and chosen to kill? Any of those are decent enough reasons I suppose. But I know we can't have goodness, decency, and happiness in this venue. It's nothing but unflinching, snarky, nihilism. That's what viewers want, right Joss? Fuck this hero nonsense.

Yeah... Spike was good for a laugh now and then, but was really at his best worst when he was a Bad Guy. Not the Neutered Bad Guy boffing the Good Girl because the Good Girl has been dragged back to Earth from Heaven.

Your points regarding nihilism being the favored direction of modern genre media are particularly relevant, IMO. Just because there isn't always a happy ending in real life doesn't mean there can't be one in fiction once in a while.

If karma were real I'd have sex with it.
Where's the applause smiley? :lol:
 
She felt betrayed by what eventually happened. Which is why she's more or less cut her ties to Mutant Enemy.

Interesting...this would also explain why there has been no rush to exploit (beyond the comics) the one arguably good property still left in Joss' arsenal. He'd have to recast.
 
So maybe my dislike for Whedon is misdirected only for that reason.
Your dislike for Whedon is clearly bordering on stalker-ish obsession.

I certainly didn't mean to imply that SMG has no career or is a failure - just not the type of success Hollywood rags like EW tried to make her out to be after The Grudge. I remember reading an article that touted her as the next big thing in Hollywood. Clearly didn't pan out that way.
 
Dawn (seasons 5-6) - too whiny, too bratty, borderline stereotype
Connor (seasons 3-4) - also whiny and bratty, but in a completely different way

Thank God these two characters never appeared on-screen together. Imagine the horror.
 
Spike. I hate everything about him. I hate his rude, condescending, patronizing attitude. I hate his neediness. I hate his stupidity and immaturity, of which he is proud of. I hate his mediocre fighting skills which he delusionally believes makes him a legitimate badass. I hate the fact that he smokes and drinks, when being dead would give you no buzz from it. And from that we must conclude that he only does it because he's a big poser and does it because he thinks it makes him look cool. I hate how he always gets a free pass on every evil act he ever committed because a bunch of dumb broads on the internet think the actor who plays him is hot. I hate how he's never been punished for anything he's ever done wrong. I hate his magically disappearing/reappearing accent. I hate his blissful and willful apathy and unawareness of the consequences of his actions. I hate how every character is forced to put up with his shit, when they have no reason to. I hate how he ruined my two favorite shows. I hate how he has nothing but contempt for his victims. I hate his fans, as they've done nothing but set the feminist movement back 50 years by supporting such a boorish, mysogonistic thug. I hate how he dragged every character down into mediocrity with him.

Hear! Hear!

As long as he was a villain he was great, a villain can be all of the above, but when they went to playing him as if he was some kine of...

Ugh, I'm not even going to bother with the bastard.

Tera was boring and useless. Lesbian Willow never sold me due to the awesomeness that was Oz.

Lesbian Willow never sold me because:

1. She cheated on Oz, with a GUY, a GUY she had had a crush on for years.

2. She ogled Giles, practically drooling, even saying out loud "I remember why I had a crush on him in high school" with Tara, her girlfriend, standing right next to her!

3. Obviously still had feelings for Oz, and was split about whether he should take him back, or remain with Tara.

4. Gushing about the hotness that was Dracula with Tara right next to her.

In other words; she was played as bisexual until mid S5, and as bisexual I'll buy her. But they decided they were going to kill of Tara, and that killing Tara would make Willow go all black eyes on everyone's asses, thus Tara had to become Willow's greatest, truest, deepest love - uh... her one true love! But... what about Oz and the other guys - some of which she all but droolingly ogled with her one true love next to her? Well, they could have let this become true by developing Tara more; and through that allowing us to see their relationship grow and deepen, and see them become so much more to each other, or...

Willow's gay nowTM. :rolleyes:

All The Slayerettes were one-dimensional and annoying. Anya was The K-Mart Cordie. Angel, in season one, was an Emo Tuxedo Mask. Riley, Xander, and Giles were characters with alot of potential that just never really grew all that much due to Whedon's dislike of normal, human characters. Buffy was fun and down-to-earth originally. Then she became whiny and self-obsessed. And then from that she also became jaded, cynical, ungrateful, preachy, moppey, bitchy, and a complete hypocrite. She became kind of like the Eliott Spitzer of Slayers really.

Once more: Hear! Hear!

How much more powerful would S4 have been, if Riley had only been a recurring character, and his character arc was given to Xander; ie. after an Initiative group gets their ass saved by Xander out on his own soldier-inspired patrols, he gets recruited for the Initiative - a new family to replace the one he lost when Bufffy and Willow went off to college and he wasn't part of it?
 
Connor- .....Oh yah... and he had sex with Cordelia! WTF?

Well, I would too given the chance. When I first saw that I was more upset by Cordy's participation in it. That all became much clearer and easier to deal with when it became obvious that Cordelia never actually appeared between "Tomorrow" and "You're Welcome".
 
Has anybody said "Buffy" yet? Because I feel like I'm the only person on the planet who never watched BTVS to see Buffy. She was a whiny, bitchy cheerleader (Which was supposed to be Cordy's role, but they gave Buffy different things to whine and bitch about.) with super strength. Most of the time watching, I would be like, "Yeah, whatever, cheerleader. just go kill the demon, 'Kay?"

My actual favorite character was Anya.
 
Kennedy, the nerds of evil and s6 Buffy all come to mind immediately for me for least favourite characters.

None of them clicked for me and in Buffy's case, I really wasn't that sympathetic to her plight. The nerds just were annoying and Kennedy was just this lame almost afterthought to the whole thing.

Adam was probably my least favourite of the level bosses (I mean series ending villains).
 
This certainly explains why just about every guest star and semi-regular and member of the crew and staff appear in "about Buffy" documentaries, panels, and commentaries, but SMG *NEVER* shows up. The one person I'd want to hear from -- the titular star of the show -- IS NEVER THERE!
 
If I recall it didn't even make half of what the animated Clone Wars movie made and CW was considered a box office disapointment. :guffaw:
Please keep this on topic while you jerk your lightsaber. Thanks.

Has anybody said "Buffy" yet? Because I feel like I'm the only person on the planet who never watched BTVS to see Buffy.
I did. I mentioned that she seemed to exist only as a center for the other characters without ever really being a character herself. She was whiny and self-absorbed, but you have to admit that represents 99% of the teenagers out there. I found it rather incredulous that someone as old as Angel would put up with her behavior half the time.

Which brings me to the question I'd like everybody to ponder - why is this all being taken so seriously? I mean, throughout the shows first, at the very least three seasons Buffy was a fun romp that had laughs, some action, and cheezy horror. It was never meant to be a serious look at existentialism or the human condition. So why are people wasting their energy hating a stupid cheezy vampire character that was never meant to be taken seriously???

If anything, the show flaunted the utter lack of consequences the characters lived with. I mean, look at the episode where Buffy kills John Ritter? It starts out with a serious examination of what would happen if a Slayer accidentally offs a real human being and ends with a chitzy, malfunctioning robot from the 50's. Thus no consequences were faced.

In one episode it is revealed that Giles as a teen participated in a group that raised a demon. The demon returns and one by one hunts and kills Giles friends with the exception of Giles and Ethan. Does Giles spend the rest of his life with regret and survivors guilt? Of course not! It's never mentioned again.

I'm not saying there were never events that had lasting effects on the characters and which were brought up on occasion. I'm saying that the show had such an air of unreality about it, with the chitzy special effects, people cracking jokes while fighting for their lives, and halloween mask style "demons" that it was damn near impossible to take things seriously - and that's what made the show fun to watch!

So why are certain people getting their panties bunched up over a crotchity british vampire who was loved by fans because he was fun to watch?

"Oh, but he killed people! That's like loving a serial killer!"

Bullshit! A fictional character that killed fictional people!
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top