Re: LE: One Constant Star by David R. George III Review Thread (Spoile
Of course, to devil's-advocate, scientists do have a tradition of being really, really goofy with naming at times.
(I still totally agree that we weren't supposed to take those seriously as actual element names in-universe though)
I included the NCC-1305-E and NCC-2010-5 for the reason that Memory Alpha respects them as valid. We discount the duck but there's no reason to discount a starship registry because we don't like the pattern.
Memory Alpha is just a fan-edited reference source, and sometimes it takes inclusionism a little too far. It has a bunch of entries for textual in-jokes that were never meant to be taken remotely seriously, for instance gag element names from "Rascals" like "babaloo" and "cheeseium" and "daffyduckium." So what Memory Alpha considers noteworthy for inclusion is a really, really bad metric for what is "valid."
Of course, to devil's-advocate, scientists do have a tradition of being really, really goofy with naming at times.

(I still totally agree that we weren't supposed to take those seriously as actual element names in-universe though)