Someone should ask Orci if Patrick Stewart, Kate Mulgrew or Avery Brooks are being considered for the draft. When he answers "Justin has yet to weigh in on that question, so I don't know," you know he's just messing with us.
yes also DOFP pretty much making double what XM films usually make wont have gone unnoticed by Paramount.In other words, ideally, we'd get a Star Trek: Days of Future Past type movie.
snip
Actually, that's the one I'd really like to see made for the 50th. Still very much a JJ-cast film, front and centre. Since obviously, it's their existence being put in danger by the franchise spanning threat. Those bases are covered by having the thing discovered a century before Kirk, and becoming all-consuming a century ahead in the future. Something which could be anything from a reference in one direction, to a full-on crossover in the other. But even at that, no more different than the U.S.S. Kelvin having a dozen or more characters appear, as its bridge crew, and then gone. Dealt with 10 minutes later, leaving another 2 hours in which it's all about the regulars. And the way to ensure that universal armageddon thing doesn't happen rests on the Abramsverse gang going on a quest across the galaxy, to regain something it currently lacks.In other words, ideally, we'd get a Star Trek: Days of Future Past type movie.
I don't want to see any character from previous iterations of Trek make an appearance. The filmmakers would do better to celebrate the 50th anniversary by just focusing on the nuTrek crew.
I don't want to see any character from previous iterations of Trek make an appearance. The filmmakers would do better to celebrate the 50th anniversary by just focusing on the nuTrek crew.
Agreed.
Star Trek 2009 was about a villain from the Prime universe creating the Abrams timeline.
Into Darkness reused numerous elements from The Wrath of Khan.
Can we please get something original for the third movie? Something completely new. The best gift that I as a Star Trek fan could receive for the 50th anniversary is a good movie that doesn't weigh itself down with useless pandering.
Geez, how did I know you'd write a big wall of text quote dissection? It's pretty unreadable and as usual misses a lot of the point.
And First Contact is absolutely relevant in that because you weren't talking about just Generations, you talked about the TNG movies as a whole.
And no, I didn't mix up "All Good Things" with anything at all. Picard jumps back in time to their first mission, and Farpoint is very much mentioned.
Sorry, but reusing sets and having a few continuity mentions != pandering.
DOFP pretty much making double what XM films usually make wont have gone unnoticed by Paramount.
worldwideDOFP pretty much making double what XM films usually make wont have gone unnoticed by Paramount.
Except that it isn't true:
1 X-Men: The Last Stand $234,362,462
2 X-Men: Days of Future Past $233,921,534
3 X2: X-Men United $214,949,694
4 X-Men Origins: Wolverine $179,883,157
5 X-Men $157,299,717
6 X-Men: First Class $146,408,305
7 The Wolverine $132,556,852
DOFP pretty much making double what XM films usually make wont have gone unnoticed by Paramount.
I can't believe X3 made that much money. What a terrible film.
I can't believe X3 made that much money. What a terrible film.
And the fact that we tend to use the same terms--"bomb," "turkey," etc.--to describe both critical and commercial disappointments just contributes to the confusion. They're not always the same thing.
DOFP pretty much making double what XM films usually make wont have gone unnoticed by Paramount.
Just looking at the figures now on Box office mojo. I can see that being a major temptation for Paramount to shove Shatner and Nimoy in the movie.
Can we please get something original for the third movie? Something completely new. The best gift that I as a Star Trek fan could receive for the 50th anniversary is a good movie that doesn't weigh itself down with useless pandering.
Although, I thought that the 50th Anniversary of "Doctor Who" handled previous threads from the series in an interesting way and the cameo of Tom Baker totally didn't pull me out of the episode in the way Nimoy's did in "Into Darkness."
I can't believe X3 made that much money. What a terrible film.
I can't believe X3 made that much money. What a terrible film.
I dont think X3 is a terrible film, I just think people think it is a popular opinion and the right thing to say, its like how everyone says the star wars prequels are bad when to me I feel the prequels had more depth than the original trilogy.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.